GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GNK vs CMRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CMRE
Costamare Inc.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$2.10B
5Y Perf.+410.0%
GNK vs CMRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GNK | CMRE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $1.10B | $2.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $114.70B | $1.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9.32B | $365M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 48.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 39.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $200M | $1.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $528M |
GNK vs CMRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GNK
CMRE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK) | 100 | 534.1 | +434.1% |
| Costamare Inc. (CMRE) | 100 | 510.0 | +410.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNK vs CMRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CMRE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Genco Shipping & Trading Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Growth Play
GNK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -19.1%, EPS growth -105.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.0%
- 401.1% 10Y total return vs CMRE's 242.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 2.34x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CMRE
Costamare Inc.
The Income Pick
CMRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 3.8%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 14.9x)
- 33.3% margin vs GNK's 8.1%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GNK | -19.1% revenue growth vs CMRE's -57.9% |
| Value | CMRE | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 14.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | CMRE | 33.3% margin vs GNK's 8.1% |
| Stability / Safety | GNK | Beta 1.00 vs CMRE's 1.25, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CMRE | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GNK's 3.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CMRE | +153.2% vs GNK's +94.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CMRE | 8.8% ROA vs GNK's 3.0%, ROIC 9.3% vs 0.7% |
GNK vs CMRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
GNK vs CMRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCMRELAGGINGGNK
GNKGenco Shipping & Trad…
1leads
CMRECostamare Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GNKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CMRE4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CMRE6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CMRE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GNK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CMRE2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GNK and CMRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 104.8x CMRE's $1.1B. CMRE is the more profitable business, keeping 33.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNK's 8.1%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $114.7B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $112M | $550M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9.3B | $365M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $15.2B | $262M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.9% | +48.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +39.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +33.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1604.6% | -61.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +175.0% | +140.0% |
Evenly matched — GNK and CMRE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CMRE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CMRE's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -252.10x | 6.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.93x | 6.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.38x | 5.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.44x |
CMRE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMRE delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for GNK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMRE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMRE scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +16.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +8.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $145M | $987M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $528M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $200M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.00x | 5.21x |
CMRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CMRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CMRE five years ago would be worth $24,622 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,536 for GNK. Over the past 12 months, CMRE leads with a +153.2% total return vs GNK's +94.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMRE at 43.9% vs GNK's 26.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +94.4% | +153.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.0% | +197.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +146.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +401.1% | +242.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +43.9% |
CMRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNK is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMRE's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.09 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.66 | $6.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 415K | 388K |
GNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CMRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GNK as "Buy" and CMRE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -18.7% upside for GNK (target: $21) vs -31.0% for CMRE (target: $12). For income investors, CMRE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs GNK's 3.00%.
| Metric | GNKGenco Shipping & … | CMRECostamare Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CMRE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CMRE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Best OverallCostamare Inc. (CMRE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GNK vs CMRE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNK or CMRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is the stronger pick with -19.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 9% for Costamare Inc. (CMRE). Costamare Inc. (CMRE) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GNK or CMRE?
On forward P/E, Costamare Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GNK or CMRE?
Over the past 5 years, Costamare Inc.
(CMRE) delivered a total return of +146. 2%, compared to +95. 4% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNK returned +401. 1% versus CMRE's +242. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GNK or CMRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus Costamare Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning CMRE is approximately 25% more volatile than GNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 70% for Costamare Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GNK or CMRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is pulling ahead at -19.
1% versus -57. 9% for Costamare Inc. (CMRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Costamare Inc. grew EPS 17. 2% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMRE leads at -7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GNK or CMRE?
Costamare Inc.
(CMRE) is the more profitable company, earning 41. 5% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 41. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMRE leads at 51. 7% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMRE leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GNK or CMRE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Costamare Inc.
(CMRE) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GNK: -18. 7% to $20. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GNK or CMRE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Costamare Inc. (CMRE) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 3. 0% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK).
09Is GNK or CMRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
00), 3. 0% yield, +401. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNK: +401. 1%, CMRE: +242. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GNK and CMRE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CMRE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GNK: 160459.3% · CMRE: -61.3%)Net Margin>
%
(GNK: 8.1% · CMRE: 33.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.