GNLN vs CGC vs ACB vs TLRY vs HYFM

For growth investors, Aurora Cannabis Inc.

(ACB) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 2% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) offers the better valuation at 164. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) a "Hold" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) delivered a total return of -65. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TLRY returned -74. 7% versus GNLN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Greenlane Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning GNLN is approximately 137% more volatile than HYFM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 76% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aurora Cannabis Inc.

(ACB) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus -67. 2% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aurora Cannabis Inc. grew EPS 102. 2% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACB leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Aurora Cannabis Inc.

(ACB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -1965. 1% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACB leads at 1. 4% versus -1245. 6% for GNLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACB leads at 54. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91)). Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HYFM: -99. 8%, GNLN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GNLN (Consumer Defensive) and CGC (Healthcare) and ACB (Healthcare) and TLRY (Healthcare) and HYFM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GNLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACB is a small-cap high-growth stock; TLRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.