GNLN vs HYFM vs IIPR vs TLRY

For growth investors, Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 2% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) delivered a total return of -50. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus GNLN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus Greenlane Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning GNLN is approximately 137% more volatile than HYFM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 76% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -67. 2% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenlane Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 93. 3% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLRY leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -1965. 1% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus -1245. 6% for GNLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IIPR leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TLRY: 76.

7% to $10. 00.

In this comparison, IIPR (13.

5% yield) pays a dividend. GNLN, HYFM, TLRY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.

(IIPR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 13. 5% yield, +436. 4% 10Y return). Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IIPR: +436. 4%, GNLN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GNLN (Consumer Defensive) and HYFM (Industrials) and IIPR (Real Estate) and TLRY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GNLN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; TLRY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IIPR pays a dividend while GNLN, HYFM, TLRY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.