GNLN vs TLRY vs CGC vs HYFM

For growth investors, Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 2% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). Analysts rate Tilray Brands, Inc. (TLRY) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) delivered a total return of -65. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TLRY returned -75. 2% versus GNLN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Greenlane Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning GNLN is approximately 185% more volatile than HYFM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 76% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tilray Brands, Inc.

(TLRY) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -67. 2% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Greenlane Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 93. 3% year-over-year, compared to -651. 7% for Tilray Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TLRY leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the more profitable company, earning -35. 1% net margin versus -1965. 1% for Greenlane Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -35. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HYFM leads at -27. 4% versus -1245. 6% for GNLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CGC leads at 29. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.

(HYFM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Greenlane Holdings, Inc. (GNLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HYFM: -99. 8%, GNLN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (GNLN (Consumer Defensive) and TLRY (Healthcare) and CGC (Healthcare) and HYFM (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.