Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GNS vs LOPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
GNS vs LOPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $22M | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $817M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | 27.9% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | 38.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.3x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $200M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $112M |
GNS vs LOPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genius Group Limited (GNS) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Grand Canyon Educat… (LOPE) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GNS vs LOPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, GNS is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
LOPE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.35
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth -0.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- 272.4% 10Y total return vs GNS's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs GNS's 6.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs GNS's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs GNS's 2.61 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -15.2% vs GNS's -17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs GNS's -37.2%, ROIC 32.5% vs -20.6% |
GNS vs LOPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GNS vs LOPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOPE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $817M annually — 142.0x GNS's $6M. LOPE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNS's -6.0%. On growth, GNS holds the edge at -44.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $817M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$31M | $341M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52M | $260M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +38.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +31.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.3% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GNS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.49x | 21.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.66x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.28x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-47 for GNS. GNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOPE's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOPE scores 5/9 vs GNS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.0% | +29.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -37.2% | +21.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.6% | +32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.3% | +33.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $200M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.45x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOPE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOPE five years ago would be worth $17,405 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9 for GNS. Over the past 12 months, LOPE leads with a -15.2% total return vs GNS's -17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOPE at 13.7% vs GNS's -72.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.9% | -0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.7% | -15.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +47.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +74.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +272.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.1% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
LOPE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOPE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GNS's 2.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOPE currently trades 73.7% from its 52-week high vs GNS's 13.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.61x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $223.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $149.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.7% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 244K |
Analyst Outlook
LOPE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $182.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.9% |
LOPE leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GNS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
GNS vs LOPE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GNS or LOPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 0% for Genius Group Limited (GNS). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GNS or LOPE?
Over the past 5 years, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) delivered a total return of +74. 1%, compared to -99. 9% for Genius Group Limited (GNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOPE returned +272. 4% versus GNS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GNS or LOPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Genius Group Limited's 2. 61β — meaning GNS is approximately 637% more volatile than LOPE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Group Limited (GNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 27% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GNS or LOPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus 6. 0% for Genius Group Limited (GNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Genius Group Limited grew EPS 76. 1% year-over-year, compared to -0. 3% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOPE leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GNS or LOPE?
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -658. 9% for Genius Group Limited — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOPE leads at 27. 5% versus -323. 2% for GNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOPE leads at 52. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GNS or LOPE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is GNS or LOPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +272. 4% 10Y return). Genius Group Limited (GNS) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOPE: +272. 4%, GNS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GNS and LOPE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.