Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $789M | $7.62B | $42.03B | $648M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.69B | $8.90B | $147.64B | $2.39B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-225M | $507M | $1.02B | $57M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 37.0% | 22.3% | 28.0% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.7% | 7.6% | 1.3% | 3.0% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 14.5x | 12.7x | 11.5x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.81B | $1.94B | $24.68B | $341M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $257M | $3.33B | $111M | $10.73B |
GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grocery Outlet Hold… (GO) | 100 | 21.8 | -78.2% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 322.3 | +222.3% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Village Super Marke… (VLGEA) | 100 | 183.6 | +83.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 5.7% margin vs GO's -4.8%
- 12.5% ROA vs GO's -6.9%, ROIC 17.8% vs -6.0%
Among these 5 stocks, KR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VLGEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 2.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 69.2%, current ratio 1.13x
- PEG 0.66 vs WMT's 4.06
- Beta 0.07, yield 2.1%, current ratio 1.13x
WMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs SFM's 203.9%
- +32.7% vs SFM's -51.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.66 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs GO's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs GO's 0.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs SFM's -51.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs GO's -6.9%, ROIC 17.8% vs -6.0% |
GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories
GO leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • KR leads 0 • VLGEA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 294.6x VLGEA's $2.4B. SFM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GO's -4.8%. On growth, GO holds the edge at +10.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $8.9B | $147.6B | $2.4B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$91M | $996M | $5.5B | $108M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$225M | $507M | $1.0B | $57M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $361M | $3.5B | $62M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +37.0% | +22.3% | +28.0% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +7.6% | +1.3% | +3.0% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +5.7% | +0.7% | +2.4% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +4.1% | +2.4% | +2.6% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +4.1% | +1.2% | +6.9% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -112.5% | -5.5% | +50.0% | +6.1% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, VLGEA trades at a 76% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VLGEA offers better value at 0.66x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $789M | $7.6B | $42.0B | $648M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $9.3B | $63.4B | $878M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.50x | 15.25x | 43.12x | 11.50x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.12x | 14.52x | 12.68x | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.90x | — | 0.66x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.35x | 10.91x | 8.07x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 0.86x | 0.28x | 0.28x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 5.70x | 7.33x | 1.32x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.16x | 16.29x | 12.55x | 18.82x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-20 for GO. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VLGEA scores 6/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.8% | +36.1% | +13.0% | +11.4% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +12.5% | +2.0% | +5.6% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.0% | +17.8% | +5.0% | +7.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.0% | +22.1% | +5.5% | +8.8% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 1.39x | 4.16x | 0.69x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $1.7B | $21.3B | $230M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $257M | $3.3B | $111M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $1.9B | $24.7B | $341M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.45x | 254.65x | 2.59x | 15.89x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,903 for GO. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs SFM's -51.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs GO's -35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | +0.4% | +6.0% | +27.4% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.6% | -51.7% | -6.4% | +22.3% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | +125.7% | +42.7% | +122.1% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.0% | +213.8% | +90.7% | +93.8% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.8% | +203.9% | +108.7% | +111.9% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.7% | +31.2% | +12.6% | +30.5% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and VLGEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GO's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VLGEA currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs GO's 41.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 0.17x | -0.64x | 0.07x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.41 | $182.00 | $76.58 | $45.12 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.66 | $64.75 | $58.60 | $30.08 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.4% | +44.5% | +86.7% | +97.4% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 54.9 | 39.2 | 55.1 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 2.2M | 5.6M | 49K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VLGEA and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GO as "Hold", SFM as "Buy", KR as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.2% upside for GO (target: $12) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, VLGEA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.05% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.08 | $91.00 | $74.75 | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 43 | 44 | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.0% | +2.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.35 | $0.90 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.2% | +6.4% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GO vs SFM vs KR vs VLGEA vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Village Super Market, Inc. (VLGEA) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Village Super Market, Inc.
(VLGEA) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. wins at 0. 86x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to -81. 0% for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus GO's -71. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. 's 0. 62β — meaning GO is approximately -197% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -675. 0% for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -4. 8% for Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus -4. 7% for GO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 86x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GO: 50. 2% to $12. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT?
In this comparison, VLGEA (2.
1% yield), KR (2. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. GO, SFM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GO or SFM or KR or VLGEA or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, GO: -71. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GO and SFM and KR and VLGEA and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VLGEA is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. KR, VLGEA, WMT pay a dividend while GO, SFM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.