REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $616M | $2.00B | $2.80B | $6.81B | $1.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $166M | $227M | $301M | $593M | $176M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $91M | $117M | $257M | $185K |
| Gross Margin | -11.7% | 27.3% | 98.0% | 84.7% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 58.7% | 56.0% | 65.0% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 83.0x | 22.0x | 21.8x | 24.1x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $856M | $1.06B | $1.21B | $2.52B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $13M | $12M | $60M | $14M |
GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 64.9 | -35.1% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 112.7 | +12.7% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 100.9 | +0.9% |
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 185.4 | +85.4% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 11.4% yield, vs GTY's 5.8%
GTY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.8%
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.8%, current ratio 29.85x
- 4.3% ROA vs NTST's 0.0%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.1%
FCPT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (21.8x vs 64.8x)
EPRT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 190.2% 10Y total return vs GTY's 133.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 59.9%, current ratio 6.13x
- PEG 1.01 vs GOOD's 2.34
- 43.3% margin vs NTST's 0.1%
NTST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0%
- +32.6% vs FCPT's -3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs GOOD's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.8x vs 64.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.3% margin vs NTST's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs GOOD's 0.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs GTY's 5.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs FCPT's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs NTST's 0.0%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.1% |
GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories
GTY leads 1 • FCPT leads 0 • EPRT leads 0 • NTST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FCPT and EPRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $593M annually — 3.6x GOOD's $166M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTST's 0.1%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $166M | $227M | $301M | $593M | $176M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $197M | $231M | $548M | $133M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $91M | $117M | $257M | $185,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $131M | $188M | -$151M | $106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +27.3% | +98.0% | +84.7% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +58.7% | +56.0% | +65.0% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +40.1% | +38.7% | +43.3% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +57.8% | +62.5% | -25.5% | +59.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +10.5% | +9.4% | +24.1% | +27.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +76.0% | +7.7% | -3.4% | +110.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, FCPT trades at a 91% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $616M | $2.0B | $2.8B | $6.8B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.0B | $4.0B | $9.3B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.02x | 24.45x | 23.37x | 24.59x | 254.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 82.97x | 21.99x | 21.81x | 24.13x | 64.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | — | 118.24x | 1.03x | 4.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.36x | 16.54x | 17.81x | 17.96x | 12.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.82x | 9.00x | 9.51x | 12.11x | 8.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 1.74x | 1.61x | 1.51x | 1.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.17x | 15.71x | 14.54x | 17.86x | 15.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTY leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $0 for NTST. EPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs GOOD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +8.8% | +7.4% | +6.3% | +0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +4.3% | +4.1% | +3.8% | +0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +4.6% | +4.5% | +4.4% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +6.3% | +6.0% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.98x | 0.74x | 0.60x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $846M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $2.5B | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $13M | $12M | $60M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $856M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $2.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 2.71x | 3.17x | 3.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPRT five years ago would be worth $14,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,026 for GOOD. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +32.6% total return vs FCPT's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOD at 12.9% vs GTY's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | +21.5% | +11.2% | +5.7% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.7% | +23.6% | -3.0% | +2.8% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.8% | +12.4% | +14.0% | +38.2% | +27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +32.2% | +17.2% | +43.1% | +14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | +133.4% | +99.1% | +190.2% | +40.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.9% | +4.0% | +4.5% | +11.4% | +8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPRT and NTST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOD's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs GOOD's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.05x | 0.14x | 0.01x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.03 | $34.75 | $28.14 | $34.73 | $21.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.33 | $25.39 | $22.78 | $28.95 | $15.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +95.0% | +90.5% | +90.6% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 48.6 | 55.6 | 45.6 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 390K | 415K | 658K | 2.0M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOD and GTY and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOOD as "Buy", GTY as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold", EPRT as "Buy", NTST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs 2.2% for GOOD (target: $13). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs EPRT's 3.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $34.00 | $27.00 | $36.50 | $22.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 13 | 15 | 22 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +3.7% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | $1.92 | $1.40 | $1.16 | $0.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
GOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). GTY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GOOD vs GTY vs FCPT vs EPRT vs NTST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST?
On trailing P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST?
Over the past 5 years, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) delivered a total return of +43. 1%, compared to -9. 7% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +190. 2% versus NTST's +40. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning GOOD is approximately 6169% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus 8. 0% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus 3. 5% for NETSTREIT Corp. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus 25. 7% for NTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 61. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 0% to $36. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 3. 7% for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT).
09Is GOOD or GTY or FCPT or EPRT or NTST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +190. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +190. 2%, GOOD: +51. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOOD and GTY and FCPT and EPRT and NTST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GTY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.