REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $616M | $149.25B | $41.15B | $2.00B | $8.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $166M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $227M | $936M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $1.43B | $260M | $91M | $387M |
| Gross Margin | -11.7% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 27.3% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 58.7% | 63.3% |
| Forward P/E | 83.0x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 22.0x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $856M | $21.38B | $13.22B | $1.06B | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $5.03B | $741M | $13M | $5M |
GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Getty Realty Corp. (GTY) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 11.4% yield, vs NNN's 5.3%
WELL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs GTY's 133.4%
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6%
- +42.7% vs GOOD's +0.7%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 184.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- Beta 0.01 vs GOOD's 0.55, lower leverage
GTY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 98.5%, current ratio 29.85x
- Beta 0.05, yield 5.8%, current ratio 29.85x
- 4.3% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.5%
NNN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.94 vs GOOD's 2.34
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 22.0x)
- 41.4% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs NNN's 6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 22.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.4% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs GOOD's 0.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, vs NNN's 5.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs GOOD's +0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 4.6% vs 2.5% |
GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NNN leads in 1 of 6 categories
GOOD leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • GTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NNN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 70.2x GOOD's $166M. NNN is the more profitable business, keeping 41.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $166M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $227M | $936M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $106M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $197M | $867M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $1.4B | $260M | $91M | $387M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $90M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $131M | $464M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -11.7% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +27.3% | +81.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +58.7% | +63.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +40.1% | +41.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +57.8% | +49.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +10.5% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +76.0% | -2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, NNN trades at a 87% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs NNN's 1.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $616M | $149.2B | $41.1B | $2.0B | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $3.0B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.02x | 153.25x | 160.26x | 24.45x | 21.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 82.97x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 21.99x | 21.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | — | — | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.36x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 16.54x | 15.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.82x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 9.00x | 9.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.76x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 1.74x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.17x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 15.71x | 12.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GOOD and NNN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +8.8% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +4.3% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +6.3% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.50x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.98x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $846M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $1.0B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $5.0B | $741M | $13M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $856M | $21.4B | $13.2B | $1.1B | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 2.71x | 2.93x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,026 for GOOD. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs GOOD's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs GTY's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +21.5% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.7% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +23.6% | +12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.8% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +12.4% | +15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +202.3% | +74.8% | +32.2% | +15.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.0% | +223.1% | +65.0% | +133.4% | +37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.9% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +4.0% | +4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOD's 0.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs GOOD's 84.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.03 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $34.75 | $46.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.33 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $25.39 | $38.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +95.0% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 48.6 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 390K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 415K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOD and NNN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOOD as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", GTY as "Buy", NNN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for WELL (target: $227) vs 2.2% for GOOD (target: $13). For income investors, GOOD offers the higher dividend yield at 11.35% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $34.00 | $46.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 34 | 32 | 13 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +5.8% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.44 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.92 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
NNN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). GOOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GOOD vs WELL vs VTR vs GTY vs NNN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN?
On trailing P/E, NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, NNN REIT, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NNN REIT, Inc. wins at 1. 94x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 2. 34x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -9. 7% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus NNN's +37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 0. 55β — meaning GOOD is approximately 5707% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 6. 6% for NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN?
NNN REIT, Inc.
(NNN) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NNN leads at 61. 5% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTY leads at 40. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 94x versus Gladstone Commercial Corporation's 2. 34x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 96. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 6. 3% to $226. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is GOOD or WELL or VTR or GTY or NNN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Getty Realty Corp.
(GTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 5. 8% yield, +133. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTY: +133. 4%, GOOD: +51. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOOD and WELL and VTR and GTY and NNN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GTY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.