Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $760M | $2.26B | $1.82B | $4.51B | $979M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.85B | $855M | $1.27B | $817M | $774M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-374M | $170M | $130M | $220M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | 51.8% | 37.4% | 51.6% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.1% | 24.3% | 14.0% | 38.0% | -11.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.6x | 11.2x | 16.3x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $492M | $105M | $109M | $200M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.32B | $132M | $141M | $112M | $793M |
GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 301.3 | +201.3% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 87.2 | -12.8% |
| Grand Canyon Educat… (LOPE) | 100 | 155.1 | +55.1% |
| Coursera, Inc. (COUR) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GOTU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs STRA's 4.0%
PRDO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs LOPE's 276.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
- Beta 0.30, yield 1.5%, current ratio 5.06x
- +21.5% vs GOTU's -40.3%
STRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 3.1%
- PEG 1.48 vs LOPE's 2.26
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 16.3x), PEG 1.48 vs 2.26
- 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
LOPE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 26.9% margin vs COUR's -8.2%
- Beta 0.29 vs GOTU's 1.01
- 21.9% ROA vs GOTU's -6.8%, ROIC 32.5% vs -47.8%
COUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs STRA's 4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 16.3x), PEG 1.48 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs COUR's -8.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs GOTU's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.5% vs GOTU's -40.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs GOTU's -6.8%, ROIC 32.5% vs -47.8% |
GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STRA leads in 1 of 6 categories
LOPE leads 1 • PRDO leads 1 • GOTU leads 0 • COUR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOTU and LOPE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 7.6x COUR's $774M. LOPE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COUR's -8.2%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $855M | $1.3B | $817M | $774M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$378M | $247M | $216M | $341M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$374M | $170M | $130M | $220M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $221M | $174M | $260M | $84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.5% | +51.8% | +37.4% | +51.6% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +24.3% | +14.0% | +38.0% | -11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +19.9% | +10.2% | +26.9% | -8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +25.8% | +13.7% | +31.8% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.9% | +4.1% | +0.8% | -100.0% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +66.7% | +30.8% | +19.4% | +11.1% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
STRA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, STRA trades at a 31% valuation discount to LOPE's 21.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.96x vs LOPE's 3.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $760M | $2.3B | $1.8B | $4.5B | $979M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $638M | $2.2B | $1.8B | $4.6B | $191M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.86x | 14.89x | 14.79x | 21.54x | -18.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.60x | 11.16x | 16.27x | 14.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.18x | 1.96x | 3.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.40x | 7.32x | 13.38x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.12x | 2.67x | 1.44x | 4.08x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.67x | 2.45x | 1.11x | 6.23x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 64.78x | 10.43x | 11.84x | 18.89x | 9.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-22 for GOTU. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOPE's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs GOTU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | +17.2% | +7.9% | +29.5% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.8% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +21.9% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.8% | +15.3% | +9.0% | +32.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.9% | +17.5% | +10.7% | +33.9% | -12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.11x | 0.07x | 0.27x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$829M | -$27M | -$32M | $88M | -$788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $132M | $141M | $112M | $793M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $492M | $105M | $109M | $200M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 50.21x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $31,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $792 for GOTU. Over the past 12 months, PRDO leads with a +21.5% total return vs GOTU's -40.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 45.7% vs COUR's -20.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.3% | +24.4% | +2.8% | +0.4% | -18.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.3% | +21.5% | -6.4% | -13.9% | -35.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.3% | +209.0% | +5.1% | +48.5% | -48.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.1% | +212.3% | +16.4% | +76.0% | -83.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.2% | +532.6% | +117.3% | +276.0% | -87.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.2% | +45.7% | +1.7% | +14.1% | -20.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRDO and LOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOPE is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOTU's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs COUR's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.30x | 0.49x | 0.29x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.56 | $38.50 | $93.45 | $223.04 | $13.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.84 | $26.66 | $69.70 | $149.37 | $5.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.2% | +93.6% | +85.8% | +74.5% | +42.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 48.3 | 48.8 | 44.7 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 391K | 585K | 310K | 244K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRDO and STRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold", STRA as "Buy", LOPE as "Buy", COUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 8.5% for STRA (target: $87). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.15% vs PRDO's 1.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.94 | $44.00 | $87.00 | $182.33 | $7.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | +3.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.56 | $2.52 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.0% | +5.3% | +7.6% | +5.9% | 0.0% |
STRA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). LOPE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GOTU vs PRDO vs STRA vs LOPE vs COUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR?
On trailing P/E, Strategic Education, Inc.
(STRA) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. at 21. 5x. On forward P/E, Strategic Education, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 48x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 26x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR?
Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +212.
3%, compared to -92. 1% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +532. 6% versus COUR's -87. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Gaotu Techedu Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning GOTU is approximately 244% more volatile than LOPE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 27% for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus 4. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coursera, Inc. grew EPS 39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COUR leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR?
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -23. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOPE leads at 27. 5% versus -26. 0% for GOTU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 48x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Grand Canyon Education, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 49. 2% to $2. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
1% yield), PRDO (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GOTU, LOPE, COUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GOTU or PRDO or STRA or LOPE or COUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 5% yield, +532. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +532. 6%, GOTU: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GOTU and PRDO and STRA and LOPE and COUR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOPE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRDO, STRA pay a dividend while GOTU, LOPE, COUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.