Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GPCR
Structure Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.+53.2%
CHRS
Coherus Oncology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$213M
5Y Perf.-74.0%
RVMD
Revolution Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$30.30B
5Y Perf.+432.5%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+55.8%
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$652M
5Y Perf.-66.8%

GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GPCR logoGPCR
CHRS logoCHRS
RVMD logoRVMD
IMVT logoIMVT
ARVN logoARVN
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$2.25B$213M$30.30B$5.53B$652M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$42M$0.00$0.00$263M
Net Income (TTM)$-170M$168M$-1.37B$-464M$-81M
Gross Margin-37.3%99.5%
Operating Margin-429.5%-44.0%
Forward P/E1.2x
Total Debt$6M$1M$159M$98K$9M
Cash & Equiv.$800M$89M$384M$714M$143M

GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GPCR
CHRS
RVMD
IMVT
ARVN
StockFeb 23May 26Return
Structure Therapeut… (GPCR)100153.2+53.2%
Coherus Oncology, I… (CHRS)10026.0-74.0%
Revolution Medicine… (RVMD)100532.5+432.5%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100155.8+55.8%
Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN)10033.2-66.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CHRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Structure Therapeutics Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. RVMD and ARVN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GPCR
Structure Therapeutics Inc.
The Income Pick

GPCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 0.96
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 24.81x
  • Beta 0.96, current ratio 24.81x
  • Beta 0.96 vs CHRS's 2.29, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CHRS
Coherus Oncology, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

CHRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.

  • 398.4% margin vs ARVN's -30.8%
  • 42.4% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
RVMD
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

RVMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 393.1% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • +278.4% vs GPCR's +47.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARVN
Arvinas, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth 53.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • -0.3% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARVN logoARVN-0.3% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
Quality / MarginsCHRS logoCHRS398.4% margin vs ARVN's -30.8%
Stability / SafetyGPCR logoGPCRBeta 0.96 vs CHRS's 2.29, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RVMD logoRVMD+278.4% vs GPCR's +47.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CHRS logoCHRS42.4% ROA vs RVMD's -59.1%

GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GPCRStructure Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CHRSCoherus Oncology, Inc.
FY 2025
Product and Service, Other
100.0%$1M
RVMDRevolution Medicines, Inc.
FY 2022
Collaboration Revenue Member
100.0%$35M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARVNArvinas, Inc.
FY 2025
License
100.0%$130M

GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCHRSLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CHRS and ARVN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ARVN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $263M and $0 in trailing revenue. CHRS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARVN's -30.8%. On growth, CHRS holds the edge at -76.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGPCR logoGPCRStructure Therape…CHRS logoCHRSCoherus Oncology,…RVMD logoRVMDRevolution Medici…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$42M$0$0$263M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$209M-$184M-$1.4B-$487M-$111M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$170M$168M-$1.4B-$464M-$81M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$159M-$139M-$1.1B-$423M-$276M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-37.3%+99.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.3%-44.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.0%-30.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.3%-105.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-76.5%-84.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-29.6%+29.5%-102.7%+19.7%-65.1%
Evenly matched — CHRS and ARVN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricGPCR logoGPCRStructure Therape…CHRS logoCHRSCoherus Oncology,…RVMD logoRVMDRevolution Medici…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$213M$30.3B$5.5B$652M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$126M$30.1B$4.8B$517M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-16.31x1.23x-23.95x-9.97x-7.96x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.06x2.48x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.53x3.47x16.61x5.83x1.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
ARVN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHRS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CHRS delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-83 for RVMD. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RVMD's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHRS scores 4/9 vs RVMD's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricGPCR logoGPCRStructure Therape…CHRS logoCHRSCoherus Oncology,…RVMD logoRVMDRevolution Medici…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.1%+7.9%-83.2%-47.1%-14.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.4%+42.4%-59.1%-44.1%-9.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-30.3%-54.3%-22.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-24.1%-127.8%-53.0%-66.1%-16.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934124
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.02x0.10x0.00x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$793M-$87M-$225M-$714M-$134M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$800M$89M$384M$714M$143M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1M$159M$98,000$9M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-28.88x-81.62x
CHRS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RVMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RVMD five years ago would be worth $48,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,229 for CHRS. Over the past 12 months, RVMD leads with a +278.4% total return vs GPCR's +47.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RVMD at 80.0% vs CHRS's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGPCR logoGPCRStructure Therape…CHRS logoCHRSCoherus Oncology,…RVMD logoRVMDRevolution Medici…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.5%+28.5%+80.3%+5.1%-11.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.2%+86.0%+278.4%+96.1%+52.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.1%-78.4%+483.1%+40.9%-58.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.6%-87.7%+382.1%+62.4%-84.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.6%-90.8%+393.1%+173.6%-36.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.7%-40.0%+80.0%+12.1%-25.5%
RVMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GPCR and RVMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GPCR is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHRS's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RVMD currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs GPCR's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGPCR logoGPCRStructure Therape…CHRS logoCHRSCoherus Oncology,…RVMD logoRVMDRevolution Medici…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.96x2.29x1.08x1.37x1.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$94.90$2.62$155.70$30.09$14.51
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.80$0.71$34.00$13.36$5.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.3%+67.3%+91.5%+90.5%+70.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10030.248.566.460.242.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded953K1.1M2.9M1.4M808K
Evenly matched — GPCR and RVMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GPCR as "Buy", CHRS as "Buy", RVMD as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 242.0% upside for CHRS (target: $6) vs 8.6% for RVMD (target: $155).

MetricGPCR logoGPCRStructure Therape…CHRS logoCHRSCoherus Oncology,…RVMD logoRVMDRevolution Medici…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ARVN logoARVNArvinas, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$114.75$6.02$154.80$45.50$13.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1416222326
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+14.1%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ARVN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CHRS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GPCR vs CHRS vs RVMD vs IMVT vs ARVN: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arvinas, Inc.

(ARVN) is the stronger pick with -0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -84. 2% for Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS). Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Structure Therapeutics Inc. (GPCR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN?

Over the past 5 years, Revolution Medicines, Inc.

(RVMD) delivered a total return of +382. 1%, compared to -87. 7% for Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RVMD returned +393. 1% versus CHRS's -90. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Structure Therapeutics Inc.

(GPCR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Coherus Oncology, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning CHRS is approximately 139% more volatile than GPCR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Revolution Medicines, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arvinas, Inc.

(ARVN) is pulling ahead at -0. 3% versus -84. 2% for Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coherus Oncology, Inc. grew EPS 472. 0% year-over-year, compared to -66. 2% for Revolution Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARVN leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN?

Coherus Oncology, Inc.

(CHRS) is the more profitable company, earning 398. 4% net margin versus -30. 8% for Arvinas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 398. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPCR leads at 0. 0% versus -429. 5% for CHRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARVN leads at 98. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is GPCR or CHRS or RVMD or IMVT or ARVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Revolution Medicines, Inc.

(RVMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +393. 1% 10Y return). Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVMD: +393. 1%, CHRS: -90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between GPCR and CHRS and RVMD and IMVT and ARVN?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GPCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GPCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHRS

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 239%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RVMD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARVN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.