Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Information Technology Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $129K | $11.89B | $10.55B | $4.83B | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $282M | $140M | $907M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $-123M | $-564M | $-1.31B | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 16.4% | 55.3% | -47.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -41.9% | -31.5% | -54.4% | -90.6% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $120M | $703M | $491M | $3.65B | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $114M | $274M | $547M | $95M |
GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Applied Digital Cor… (APLD) | 100 | 1236.0 | +1136.0% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 100 | 633.8 | +533.8% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
- Beta 2.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.27x
- Beta 2.34 vs BTBT's 3.37
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
APLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs WULF's 161.2%
- +6.9% vs GPUS's -98.1%
WULF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.11, current ratio 1.27x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.34 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs GPUS's -98.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC 6.5% vs -10.6% |
GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GPUS leads 2 • APLD leads 0 • WULF leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 9.6x GPUS's $95M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, APLD holds the edge at +98.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $282M | $140M | $907M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$53M | -$72M | $627M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | -$123M | -$564M | -$1.3B | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$1.3B | -$677M | -$312M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +16.4% | +55.3% | -47.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.9% | -31.5% | -54.4% | -90.6% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.8% | -43.5% | -51.7% | -144.6% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | -4.8% | -2.1% | -34.4% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.7% | +98.2% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.4% | +89.4% | -17.7% | -4.8% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APLD's 1099.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $128,863 | $11.9B | $10.5B | $4.8B | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $12.5B | $10.8B | $7.9B | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -35.80x | -114.38x | -3.44x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1099.67x | — | — | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 55.16x | 75.33x | 5.32x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 13.18x | 34.52x | 1.30x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.6% | -6.2% | -2.3% | -30.5% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | -2.3% | -23.0% | -17.1% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.9% | -7.3% | -10.6% | -9.0% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -114.4% | -9.5% | -15.9% | -12.1% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 57.56x | 1.11x | 2.01x | 1.05x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116M | $589M | $217M | $3.1B | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $114M | $274M | $547M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $120M | $703M | $491M | $3.6B | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.75x | -2.01x | -27.06x | 4.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — APLD and WULF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, APLD leads with a +691.0% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WULF at 143.2% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.9% | +47.7% | +88.5% | +28.2% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.1% | +691.0% | +687.5% | -4.7% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1125.1% | +1338.3% | +36.1% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +756.3% | +182.0% | -59.5% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +756.3% | +161.2% | -51.6% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.0% | +130.5% | +143.2% | +10.8% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPUS is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 3.23x | 3.25x | 3.11x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.98 | $44.22 | $25.75 | $23.45 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $5.09 | $2.89 | $6.66 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +93.9% | +93.3% | +54.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 74.4 | 73.6 | 69.6 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.9M | 20.3M | 30.4M | 47.6M | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APLD as "Buy", WULF as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). For income investors, GPUS offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.00 | $32.13 | $16.13 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 12 | 19 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.0% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.87 | $0.01 | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPUS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
GPUS vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.
3%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.
(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 44% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT?
In this comparison, GPUS (100.
0% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. APLD, WULF, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GPUS or APLD or WULF or MARA or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.
3% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GPUS and APLD and WULF and MARA and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GPUS (Industrials) and APLD (Technology) and WULF (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WULF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while APLD, WULF, MARA, BTBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.