Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$129K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
IREN
IREN Limited

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • AU
Market Cap$18.86B
5Y Perf.+554.2%
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.89B
5Y Perf.+1136.0%
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.55B
5Y Perf.+533.8%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-18.6%

GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GPUS logoGPUS
IREN logoIREN
APLD logoAPLD
WULF logoWULF
MARA logoMARA
IndustryAerospace & DefenseFinancial - Capital MarketsInformation Technology ServicesFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$129K$18.86B$11.89B$10.55B$4.83B
Revenue (TTM)$95M$501M$282M$140M$907M
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$402M$-123M$-564M$-1.31B
Gross Margin20.0%68.3%16.4%55.3%-47.7%
Operating Margin-41.9%3.5%-31.5%-54.4%-90.6%
Forward P/E139.2x
Total Debt$120M$964M$703M$491M$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$565M$114M$274M$547M

GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GPUS
IREN
APLD
WULF
MARA
StockApr 22May 26Return
Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS)1000.0-100.0%
IREN Limited (IREN)100654.2+554.2%
Applied Digital Cor… (APLD)1001236.0+1136.0%
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)100633.8+533.8%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10081.4-18.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IREN leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. MARA also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
The Income Pick

GPUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
  • Beta 2.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.27x
  • Beta 2.34 vs WULF's 3.25
  • 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
IREN
IREN Limited
The Banking Pick

IREN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 167.7%, EPS growth 234.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.97, Low D/E 53.1%, current ratio 4.29x
  • 167.7% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
  • 17.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

APLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs WULF's 161.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, WULF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIREN logoIREN167.7% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
ValueMARA logoMARABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsIREN logoIREN17.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyGPUS logoGPUSBeta 2.34 vs WULF's 3.25
DividendsGPUS logoGPUS100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)IREN logoIREN+7.7% vs GPUS's -98.1%
Efficiency (ROA)IREN logoIREN9.9% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC 0.7% vs -10.6%

GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IRENIREN Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

APLDApplied Digital Corporation
FY 2022
Mining Segment
100.0%$51,000
WULFTeraWulf Inc.
FY 2024
Data Center Hosting
100.0%$800,000
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIRENLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 9.6x GPUS's $95M. IREN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, APLD holds the edge at +98.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …IREN logoIRENIREN LimitedAPLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$95M$501M$282M$140M$907M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M$172M-$53M-$72M$627M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M$402M-$123M-$564M-$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$40M-$260M-$1.3B-$677M-$312M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.0%+68.3%+16.4%+55.3%-47.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-41.9%+3.5%-31.5%-54.4%-90.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-38.8%+17.4%-43.5%-51.7%-144.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-42.1%-2.2%-4.8%-2.1%-34.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.7%+98.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.4%-7.1%+89.4%-17.7%-4.8%
IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, IREN's 97.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APLD's 1099.7x.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …IREN logoIRENIREN LimitedAPLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$128,863$18.9B$11.9B$10.5B$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$116M$19.3B$12.5B$10.8B$7.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x145.77x-35.80x-114.38x-3.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.139.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple97.06x1099.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x37.64x55.16x75.33x5.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x6.98x13.18x34.52x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IREN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

IREN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. IREN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IREN scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …IREN logoIRENIREN LimitedAPLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-63.6%+18.6%-6.2%-2.3%-30.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-15.1%+9.9%-2.3%-23.0%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.9%+0.7%-7.3%-10.6%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-114.4%+0.9%-9.5%-15.9%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936333
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage57.56x0.53x1.11x2.01x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$116M$400M$589M$217M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$565M$114M$274M$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$120M$964M$703M$491M$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.75x16.60x-2.01x-27.06x4.73x
IREN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, IREN leads with a +765.3% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IREN at 158.8% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …IREN logoIRENIREN LimitedAPLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.9%+33.1%+47.7%+88.5%+28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.1%+765.3%+691.0%+687.5%-4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+1633.2%+1125.1%+1338.3%+36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+132.5%+756.3%+182.0%-59.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+132.5%+756.3%+161.2%-51.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-98.0%+158.8%+130.5%+143.2%+10.8%
IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GPUS is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WULF's 3.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …IREN logoIRENIREN LimitedAPLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.34x2.97x3.23x3.25x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.98$76.87$44.22$25.75$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.12$6.36$5.09$2.89$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.2%+74.0%+93.9%+93.3%+54.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.971.374.473.669.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded27.9M34.5M20.3M30.4M47.6M
Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: IREN as "Buy", APLD as "Buy", WULF as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.9% upside for APLD (target: $61) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). GPUS is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …IREN logoIRENIREN LimitedAPLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.57$61.00$32.13$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts13131219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.87$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%+1.1%+1.0%
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IREN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPUS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallIREN Limited (IREN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, IREN Limited (IREN) is the stronger pick with 167.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). IREN Limited (IREN) offers the better valuation at 145. 8x trailing P/E (139. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IREN Limited (IREN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.

3%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.

(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus TeraWulf Inc. 's 3. 25β — meaning WULF is approximately 39% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IREN Limited (IREN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IREN Limited (IREN) is pulling ahead at 167.

7% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IREN Limited grew EPS 234. 5% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?

IREN Limited (IREN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

4% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IREN leads at 3. 5% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IREN leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APLD: 46.

9% to $61. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?

In this comparison, GPUS (100.

0% yield) pays a dividend. IREN, APLD, WULF, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.

3% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GPUS and IREN and APLD and WULF and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (GPUS (Industrials) and IREN (Financial Services) and APLD (Technology) and WULF (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IREN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WULF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while IREN, APLD, WULF, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GPUS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IREN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 83%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WULF

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GPUS and IREN and APLD and WULF and MARA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GPUS: -21.7% · IREN: 167.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.