Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Information Technology Services
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Financial - Capital Markets | Information Technology Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $129K | $18.86B | $11.89B | $10.55B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $95M | $501M | $282M | $140M | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $402M | $-123M | $-564M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 20.0% | 68.3% | 16.4% | 55.3% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -41.9% | 3.5% | -31.5% | -54.4% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 139.2x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $120M | $964M | $703M | $491M | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $565M | $114M | $274M | $547M |
GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| IREN Limited (IREN) | 100 | 654.2 | +554.2% |
| Applied Digital Cor… (APLD) | 100 | 1236.0 | +1136.0% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 100 | 633.8 | +533.8% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 81.4 | -18.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GPUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
- Beta 2.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.27x
- Beta 2.34 vs WULF's 3.25
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
IREN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 167.7%, EPS growth 234.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.97, Low D/E 53.1%, current ratio 4.29x
- 167.7% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
- 17.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
APLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs WULF's 161.2%
Among these 5 stocks, WULF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MARA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 167.7% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.4% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.34 vs WULF's 3.25 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs GPUS's -98.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC 0.7% vs -10.6% |
GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IREN leads in 3 of 6 categories
GPUS leads 2 • APLD leads 0 • WULF leads 0 • MARA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 9.6x GPUS's $95M. IREN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, APLD holds the edge at +98.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $95M | $501M | $282M | $140M | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $172M | -$53M | -$72M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $402M | -$123M | -$564M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$40M | -$260M | -$1.3B | -$677M | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +68.3% | +16.4% | +55.3% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -41.9% | +3.5% | -31.5% | -54.4% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.8% | +17.4% | -43.5% | -51.7% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | -2.2% | -4.8% | -2.1% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.7% | — | +98.2% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.4% | -7.1% | +89.4% | -17.7% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IREN's 97.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APLD's 1099.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $128,863 | $18.9B | $11.9B | $10.5B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $116M | $19.3B | $12.5B | $10.8B | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 145.77x | -35.80x | -114.38x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 139.17x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 97.06x | 1099.67x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 37.64x | 55.16x | 75.33x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.06x | 6.98x | 13.18x | 34.52x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IREN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IREN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. IREN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.53x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IREN scores 6/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -63.6% | +18.6% | -6.2% | -2.3% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | +9.9% | -2.3% | -23.0% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.9% | +0.7% | -7.3% | -10.6% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -114.4% | +0.9% | -9.5% | -15.9% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 57.56x | 0.53x | 1.11x | 2.01x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116M | $400M | $589M | $217M | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $565M | $114M | $274M | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $120M | $964M | $703M | $491M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.75x | 16.60x | -2.01x | -27.06x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IREN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, IREN leads with a +765.3% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IREN at 158.8% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.9% | +33.1% | +47.7% | +88.5% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.1% | +765.3% | +691.0% | +687.5% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1633.2% | +1125.1% | +1338.3% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +132.5% | +756.3% | +182.0% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +132.5% | +756.3% | +161.2% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -98.0% | +158.8% | +130.5% | +143.2% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPUS is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WULF's 3.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 2.97x | 3.23x | 3.25x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.98 | $76.87 | $44.22 | $25.75 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $6.36 | $5.09 | $2.89 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +74.0% | +93.9% | +93.3% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 71.3 | 74.4 | 73.6 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.9M | 34.5M | 20.3M | 30.4M | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IREN as "Buy", APLD as "Buy", WULF as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.9% upside for APLD (target: $61) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). GPUS is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.57 | $61.00 | $32.13 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 13 | 12 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.87 | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +1.1% | +1.0% |
IREN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPUS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
GPUS vs IREN vs APLD vs WULF vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IREN Limited (IREN) is the stronger pick with 167.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). IREN Limited (IREN) offers the better valuation at 145. 8x trailing P/E (139. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IREN Limited (IREN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.
3%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.
(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus TeraWulf Inc. 's 3. 25β — meaning WULF is approximately 39% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IREN Limited (IREN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 53% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IREN Limited (IREN) is pulling ahead at 167.
7% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IREN Limited grew EPS 234. 5% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?
IREN Limited (IREN) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
4% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IREN leads at 3. 5% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IREN leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APLD: 46.
9% to $61. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA?
In this comparison, GPUS (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. IREN, APLD, WULF, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GPUS or IREN or APLD or WULF or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.
3% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GPUS and IREN and APLD and WULF and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (GPUS (Industrials) and IREN (Financial Services) and APLD (Technology) and WULF (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IREN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WULF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while IREN, APLD, WULF, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.