Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$129K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.55B
5Y Perf.+533.8%
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.89B
5Y Perf.+1136.0%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-18.6%

GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
GPUS logoGPUS
WULF logoWULF
APLD logoAPLD
MARA logoMARA
IndustryAerospace & DefenseFinancial - Capital MarketsInformation Technology ServicesFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$129K$10.55B$11.89B$4.83B
Revenue (TTM)$95M$140M$282M$907M
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$-564M$-123M$-1.31B
Gross Margin20.0%55.3%16.4%-47.7%
Operating Margin-41.9%-54.4%-31.5%-90.6%
Total Debt$120M$491M$703M$3.65B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$274M$114M$547M

GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

GPUS
WULF
APLD
MARA
StockApr 22May 26Return
Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS)1000.0-100.0%
TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)100633.8+533.8%
Applied Digital Cor… (APLD)1001236.0+1136.0%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10081.4-18.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GPUS leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Applied Digital Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. WULF and MARA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GPUS
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
The Income Pick

GPUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
  • Beta 2.34, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.27x
  • -38.8% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
  • Beta 2.34 vs WULF's 3.25
Best for: income & stability and defensive
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
The Banking Pick

WULF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 102.3%, EPS growth 40.0%
  • 102.3% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
Best for: growth exposure
APLD
Applied Digital Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

APLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs WULF's 161.2%
  • +6.9% vs GPUS's -98.1%
  • -2.3% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC -7.3% vs -10.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 3.11, current ratio 1.27x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWULF logoWULF102.3% NII/revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
ValueMARA logoMARABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsGPUS logoGPUS-38.8% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
Stability / SafetyGPUS logoGPUSBeta 2.34 vs WULF's 3.25
DividendsGPUS logoGPUS100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs APLD's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)APLD logoAPLD+6.9% vs GPUS's -98.1%
Efficiency (ROA)APLD logoAPLD-2.3% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC -7.3% vs -10.6%

GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

WULFTeraWulf Inc.
FY 2024
Data Center Hosting
100.0%$800,000
APLDApplied Digital Corporation
FY 2022
Mining Segment
100.0%$51,000
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M

GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGPUSLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 9.6x GPUS's $95M. GPUS is the more profitable business, keeping -38.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, APLD holds the edge at +98.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$95M$140M$282M$907M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$18M-$72M-$53M$627M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M-$564M-$123M-$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$40M-$677M-$1.3B-$312M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.0%+55.3%+16.4%-47.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-41.9%-54.4%-31.5%-90.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-38.8%-51.7%-43.5%-144.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-42.1%-2.1%-4.8%-34.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.7%+98.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+98.4%-17.7%+89.4%-4.8%
Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Market CapShares × price$128,863$10.5B$11.9B$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$116M$10.8B$12.5B$7.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-114.38x-35.80x-3.44x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1099.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x75.33x55.16x5.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.06x34.52x13.18x1.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

APLD leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

APLD delivers a -6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. MARA carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-63.6%-2.3%-6.2%-30.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-15.1%-23.0%-2.3%-17.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.9%-10.6%-7.3%-9.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-114.4%-15.9%-9.5%-12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93333
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage57.56x2.01x1.11x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$116M$217M$589M$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$274M$114M$547M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$120M$491M$703M$3.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.75x-27.06x-2.01x4.73x
APLD leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — WULF and APLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in APLD five years ago would be worth $85,629 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, APLD leads with a +691.0% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WULF at 143.2% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.9%+88.5%+47.7%+28.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-98.1%+687.5%+691.0%-4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+1338.3%+1125.1%+36.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+182.0%+756.3%-59.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+161.2%+756.3%-51.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-98.0%+143.2%+130.5%+10.8%
Evenly matched — WULF and APLD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GPUS is the less volatile stock with a 2.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WULF's 3.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APLD currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.34x3.25x3.23x3.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.98$25.75$44.22$23.45
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.12$2.89$5.09$6.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.2%+93.3%+93.9%+54.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.973.674.469.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded27.9M30.4M20.3M47.6M
Evenly matched — GPUS and APLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WULF as "Buy", APLD as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.9% upside for APLD (target: $61) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). GPUS is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGPUS logoGPUSHyperscale Data, …WULF logoWULFTeraWulf Inc.APLD logoAPLDApplied Digital C…MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.13$61.00$16.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts121319
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.87$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.1%+0.3%+1.0%
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GPUS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). APLD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallHyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

GPUS vs WULF vs APLD vs MARA: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TeraWulf Inc.

(WULF) is the stronger pick with 102. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Analysts rate TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA?

Over the past 5 years, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) delivered a total return of +756.

3%, compared to -100. 0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APLD returned +756. 3% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyperscale Data, Inc.

(GPUS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 34β versus TeraWulf Inc. 's 3. 25β — meaning WULF is approximately 39% more volatile than GPUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TeraWulf Inc.

(WULF) is pulling ahead at 102. 3% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hyperscale Data, Inc. grew EPS 76. 2% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APLD leads at 193. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA?

TeraWulf Inc.

(WULF) is the more profitable company, earning -51. 7% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -51. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLD leads at -33. 5% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WULF leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA?

In this comparison, GPUS (100.

0% yield) pays a dividend. WULF, APLD, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is GPUS or WULF or APLD or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Applied Digital Corporation (APLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+756.

3% 10Y return). Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (APLD: +756. 3%, MARA: -51. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between GPUS and WULF and APLD and MARA?

These companies operate in different sectors (GPUS (Industrials) and WULF (Financial Services) and APLD (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WULF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; APLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while WULF, APLD, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

GPUS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Gross Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WULF

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform GPUS and WULF and APLD and MARA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(GPUS: -21.7% · WULF: 102.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.