Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GRAB vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
GRAB vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $14.98B | $5.05T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.55B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $379M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 34.5x | 25.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.05B | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.43B | $10.61B |
GRAB vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1590.1 | +1490.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRAB vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.42
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 1.75x
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 234.3% 10Y total return vs GRAB's -68.3%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs GRAB's 20.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs GRAB's 20.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.1x vs 34.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs GRAB's 10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.42 vs NVDA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.9% vs GRAB's -22.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs GRAB's 3.3%, ROIC 81.8% vs 3.3% |
GRAB vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GRAB vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 60.8x GRAB's $3.6B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRAB's 10.7%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $395M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $379M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$88M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.5% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GRAB and NVDA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 42.4x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 28% valuation discount to GRAB's 59.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GRAB's 35.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 37.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.0B | $5.05T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.6B | $5.05T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 59.18x | 42.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.46x | 25.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.88x | 37.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.44x | 23.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 32.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 111.77x | 52.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $6 for GRAB. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GRAB's 0.30x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.4B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.4B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.1B | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.96x | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $143,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,184 for GRAB. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +82.9% total return vs GRAB's -22.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 92.4% vs GRAB's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.8% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.1% | +82.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.9% | +612.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.2% | +1331.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.3% | +23433.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.1% | +92.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRAB and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs GRAB's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.62 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.48 | $110.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.9% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47.7M | 166.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GRAB as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 77.7% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 34.3% for NVDA (target: $279).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.70 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
GRAB vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRAB or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 5% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 42. 4x trailing P/E (25. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRAB or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 42.
4x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRAB or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1331%, compared to -68.
2% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +234. 3% versus GRAB's -68. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRAB or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
42β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 21% more volatile than GRAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 30% for Grab Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRAB or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 20. 5% for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grab Holdings Limited grew EPS 342. 2% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRAB or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 8. 0% for Grab Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 6. 0% for GRAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRAB or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
1x forward P/E versus 34. 5x for Grab Holdings Limited — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 77. 7% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRAB or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is GRAB or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRAB: -68. 3%, NVDA: +234. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRAB and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.