Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $348M | $5.14T | $550.40B | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $100M | $215.94B | $53.76B | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-67M | $120.07B | $-3.17B | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 33.5% | 71.1% | 35.4% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -71.5% | 60.4% | -9.4% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.6x | 25.6x | 105.1x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $11.41B | $46.59B | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $10.61B | $14.27B | $7.84B |
GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gorilla Technology … (GRRR) | 100 | 15.6 | -84.4% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1302.3 | +1202.3% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 191.9 | +91.9% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GRRR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 105.1x)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs QCOM's 350.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs QCOM's 9.06
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +439.7% vs GRRR's +3.4%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- Beta 1.55 vs GRRR's 2.36
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 105.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs GRRR's -67.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs GRRR's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs GRRR's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs GRRR's -36.4%, ROIC 81.8% vs -64.6% |
GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
GRRR leads 1 • QCOM leads 1 • INTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 2164.8x GRRR's $100M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GRRR's -67.3%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $100M | $215.9B | $53.8B | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$70M | $133.2B | $4.0B | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$67M | $120.1B | -$3.2B | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$25M | $96.7B | -$3.1B | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.5% | +71.1% | +35.4% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -71.5% | +60.4% | -9.4% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -67.3% | +55.6% | -5.9% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +44.8% | -5.8% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.0% | +73.2% | +7.2% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +97.8% | -2.8% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GRRR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 6% valuation discount to NVDA's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $348M | $5.14T | $550.4B | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $5.14T | $582.7B | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.50x | 43.16x | -1861.12x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.58x | 25.55x | 105.10x | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | — | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x | 49.88x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.66x | 23.80x | 10.41x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 32.85x | 4.21x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x | — | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-57 for GRRR. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTC scores 6/9 vs GRRR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -57.3% | +76.3% | -2.7% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -36.4% | +58.1% | -1.6% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.6% | +81.8% | -0.0% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -95.9% | +97.2% | -0.0% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.07x | 0.37x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $508,962 | $807M | $32.3B | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $10.6B | $14.3B | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $11.4B | $46.6B | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -114.84x | 545.03x | 3.71x | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,558 for GRRR. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs GRRR's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs GRRR's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.9% | +12.0% | +178.4% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.4% | +80.7% | +439.7% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.4% | +625.9% | +258.3% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +1328.9% | +95.8% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | +23902.3% | +299.2% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.5% | +93.6% | +53.0% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVDA and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRRR's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs GRRR's 55.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.73x | 2.15x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.90 | $216.80 | $114.51 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.04 | $112.28 | $18.97 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.0% | +97.6% | +95.7% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 60.7 | 85.9 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 634K | 164.5M | 110.6M | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GRRR as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 131.3% upside for GRRR (target: $36) vs -29.6% for INTC (target: $77). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.50 | $278.83 | $77.18 | $175.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 79 | 84 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GRRR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
GRRR vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 40.
4x versus NVIDIA Corporation at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Gorilla Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -84.
4% for Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus GRRR's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
55β versus Gorilla Technology Group Inc. 's 2. 36β — meaning GRRR is approximately 52% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -473. 8% for Gorilla Technology Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -86. 8% for Gorilla Technology Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -89. 6% for GRRR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR) trades at 5. 6x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 99. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRRR: 131. 3% to $35. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GRRR, NVDA, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GRRR or NVDA or INTC or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +350. 2% 10Y return). Gorilla Technology Group Inc. (GRRR) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +350. 2%, GRRR: -84. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GRRR and NVDA and INTC and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRRR is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while GRRR, NVDA, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.