Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Telecommunications Services
GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $10.33B | $1.10B | $24.95B | $4.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $262M | $361M | $3.17B | $876M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-50M | $-24M | $1.29B | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 79.3% | 86.6% | 62.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | 4.1% | 45.3% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 217.8x | 19.4x | 36.1x |
| Total Debt | $542M | $473M | $0.00 | $1.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $391M | $75M | $1.56B | $97M |
GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1826.9 | +1726.9% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| United Therapeutics… (UTHR) | 100 | 482.6 | +382.6% |
| Iridium Communicati… (IRDM) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GSAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +305.2% vs MNKD's -26.8%
MNKD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth -79.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.8%
- 22.2% revenue growth vs IRDM's 4.9%
UTHR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- Beta 0.19, current ratio 6.60x
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 217.8x)
- 40.6% margin vs GSAT's -19.0%
IRDM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 1.5%
- 412.1% 10Y total return vs UTHR's 410.0%
- 1.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs IRDM's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 217.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.6% margin vs GSAT's -19.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs GSAT's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs MNKD's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.2% ROA vs MNKD's -3.9%, ROIC 21.1% vs 21.6% |
GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UTHR leads in 2 of 6 categories
GSAT leads 1 • IRDM leads 1 • MNKD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTHR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UTHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 12.1x GSAT's $262M. UTHR is the more profitable business, keeping 40.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -19.0%. On growth, MNKD holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $262M | $361M | $3.2B | $876M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $93M | $25M | $1.6B | $439M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$50M | -$24M | $1.3B | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $151M | $13M | $1.0B | $305M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.2% | +79.3% | +86.6% | +62.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +4.1% | +45.3% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.0% | -6.6% | +40.6% | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | +3.6% | +32.1% | +34.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +15.1% | -1.6% | +1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -121.9% | -2.2% | -12.2% | -25.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UTHR and IRDM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, UTHR trades at a 88% valuation discount to MNKD's 177.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IRDM's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.3B | $1.1B | $24.9B | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $1.5B | $23.4B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -138.10x | 177.50x | 20.43x | 37.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 217.79x | 19.38x | 36.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 119.09x | 29.26x | 14.82x | 13.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 41.28x | 3.14x | 7.84x | 4.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 28.58x | — | 3.84x | 9.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 57.85x | 80.08x | 23.97x | 14.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UTHR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRDM delivers a 22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-14 for GSAT. GSAT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRDM's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRDM scores 8/9 vs MNKD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.7% | — | +19.2% | +22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -3.9% | +17.2% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +21.6% | +21.1% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +8.3% | +21.4% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | — | — | 3.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $151M | $399M | -$1.6B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $391M | $75M | $1.6B | $97M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $542M | $473M | $0 | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.07x | 0.75x | 125.37x | 2.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,275 for MNKD. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs MNKD's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs IRDM's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.3% | -36.6% | +14.6% | +127.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +305.2% | -26.8% | +85.4% | +55.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +484.1% | -8.5% | +170.4% | -33.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +393.8% | -17.2% | +191.3% | +10.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +201.8% | -46.2% | +410.0% | +412.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.1% | -2.9% | +39.3% | -12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GSAT and UTHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UTHR is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSAT's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs MNKD's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 0.90x | 0.19x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.85 | $6.51 | $609.35 | $44.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.24 | $2.23 | $272.12 | $15.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +54.5% | +93.4% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 74.3 | 65.0 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 6.4M | 516K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
IRDM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GSAT as "Hold", MNKD as "Buy", UTHR as "Buy", IRDM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.2% upside for MNKD (target: $7) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, IRDM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.45% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.00 | $7.00 | $610.67 | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 19 | 30 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — | — | $0.58 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.4% |
UTHR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GSAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
GSAT vs MNKD vs UTHR vs IRDM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is the stronger pick with 22.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM?
On trailing P/E, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the cheapest at 20.
4x versus MannKind Corporation at 177. 5x. On forward P/E, United Therapeutics Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -17. 2% for MannKind Corporation (MNKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRDM returned +412. 1% versus MNKD's -46. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Globalstar, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning GSAT is approximately 987% more volatile than UTHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 151% versus 4% for Iridium Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MannKind Corporation (MNKD) is pulling ahead at 22.
2% versus 4. 9% for Iridium Communications Inc. (IRDM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Therapeutics Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNKD leads at 51. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM?
United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
9% net margin versus -25. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 41. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTHR leads at 46. 9% versus -0. 4% for GSAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UTHR leads at 87. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 217. 8x for MannKind Corporation — 198. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 97. 2% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM?
In this comparison, IRDM (1.
5% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. MNKD, UTHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GSAT or MNKD or UTHR or IRDM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Therapeutics Corporation (UTHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), +410. 0% 10Y return). Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UTHR: +410. 0%, GSAT: +201. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GSAT and MNKD and UTHR and IRDM?
These companies operate in different sectors (GSAT (Communication Services) and MNKD (Healthcare) and UTHR (Healthcare) and IRDM (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; UTHR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IRDM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IRDM pays a dividend while GSAT, MNKD, UTHR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.