Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Agricultural - Machinery
Construction
Construction
GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Agricultural - Machinery | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $6.61B | $1.97B | $1.21B | $12.25B | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.45B | $17.91B | $1.48B | $2.99B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $249M | $-2.08B | $26M | $471M | $191M |
| Gross Margin | 40.1% | 14.7% | 26.1% | 38.2% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 1.6% | 3.7% | 22.8% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 22.7x | 14.2x | 23.7x | 24.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.51B | $7.26B | $320M | $1.45B | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $812M | $801M | $72M | $463M | $4M |
GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gates Industrial Co… (GTES) | 100 | 258.5 | +158.5% |
| The Goodyear Tire &… (GT) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Advanced Drainage S… (WMS) | 100 | 324.9 | +224.9% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTES ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.56 vs TREX's 7.16
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.56 vs 7.16
GT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.96 vs ASTE's 1.63
ASTE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.1%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 8.1% revenue growth vs GT's -3.2%
- 1.0% yield, vs WMS's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +40.5% vs GT's -37.7%
WMS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 0.4%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs GTES's 40.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 88.3%, current ratio 3.33x
- Beta 1.32, yield 0.4%, current ratio 3.33x
TREX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 16.3% margin vs GT's -11.6%
- 12.3% ROA vs GT's -10.5%, ROIC 16.4% vs 4.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.1% revenue growth vs GT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.56 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs GT's -11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs ASTE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, vs WMS's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.5% vs GT's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs GT's -10.5%, ROIC 16.4% vs 4.3% |
GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GT leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • GTES leads 1 • ASTE leads 0 • WMS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — WMS and TREX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.9B annually — 15.2x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GT's -11.6%. On growth, ASTE holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $17.9B | $1.5B | $3.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $640M | $1.1B | $84M | $869M | $309M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $249M | -$2.1B | $26M | $471M | $191M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $421M | -$126M | $44M | $577M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.1% | +14.7% | +26.1% | +38.2% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +1.6% | +3.7% | +22.8% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | -11.6% | +1.7% | +15.7% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | -0.7% | +3.0% | +19.3% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.4% | -8.7% | +20.3% | +0.4% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -3.1% | -90.3% | +14.4% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
GT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, TREX trades at a 30% valuation discount to ASTE's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GTES offers better value at 0.94x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.6B | $2.0B | $1.2B | $12.2B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $8.4B | $1.5B | $13.2B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.06x | -1.15x | 31.55x | 25.01x | 22.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.15x | 22.70x | 14.17x | 23.71x | 23.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | — | — | 6.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.20x | 4.96x | 14.36x | 15.74x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 0.11x | 0.86x | 4.22x | 3.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 0.58x | 1.80x | 6.89x | 4.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.34x | — | 56.50x | 33.23x | 30.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMS delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-55 for GT. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GT's 2.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTES scores 8/9 vs ASTE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | -55.3% | +3.8% | +23.2% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | -10.5% | +2.0% | +11.4% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.5% | +4.3% | +6.2% | +20.7% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +5.2% | +7.2% | +21.5% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 2.13x | 0.47x | 0.88x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $6.5B | $248M | $982M | $225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $812M | $801M | $72M | $463M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $7.3B | $320M | $1.4B | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.59x | -0.29x | 5.48x | 7.75x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTES five years ago would be worth $14,787 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,488 for GT. Over the past 12 months, ASTE leads with a +40.5% total return vs GT's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTES at 22.9% vs GT's -15.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | -23.1% | +19.0% | -3.6% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.2% | -37.7% | +40.5% | +30.2% | -30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.7% | -39.9% | +31.7% | +67.7% | -30.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | -65.1% | -20.4% | +27.2% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | -68.6% | +22.1% | +549.9% | +239.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | -15.6% | +9.6% | +18.8% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTES and GT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GT is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTES currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs TREX's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.96x | 1.63x | 1.32x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.47 | $12.03 | $65.65 | $179.31 | $68.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.97 | $6.14 | $36.43 | $104.69 | $29.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +57.0% | +80.7% | +80.4% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 57.3 | 39.1 | 51.3 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 7.9M | 227K | 860K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ASTE and WMS and TREX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GTES as "Buy", GT as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", WMS as "Hold", TREX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.7% upside for WMS (target: $203) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, ASTE offers the higher dividend yield at 0.97% vs WMS's 0.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $30.83 | $8.15 | $36.00 | $202.67 | $44.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 26 | 12 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.0% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.51 | $0.64 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.3% |
GT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
GTES vs GT vs ASTE vs WMS vs TREX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is the stronger pick with 8. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (24. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX?
On trailing P/E, Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus Astec Industries, Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, Astec Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Gates Industrial Corporation plc wins at 0. 56x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX?
Over the past 5 years, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) delivered a total return of +47.
9%, compared to -65. 1% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMS returned +549. 9% versus GT's -68. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
96β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ASTE is approximately 70% more volatile than GT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Astec Industries, Inc.
(ASTE) is pulling ahead at 8. 1% versus -3. 2% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTE leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -9. 4% for The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WMS leads at 22. 6% versus 3. 6% for GT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTES leads at 40. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMS: 40. 7% to $202. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX?
In this comparison, ASTE (1.
0% yield), WMS (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GTES, GT, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTES or GT or ASTE or WMS or TREX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
(WMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+549. 9% 10Y return). Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMS: +549. 9%, GTES: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTES and GT and ASTE and WMS and TREX?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTES (Industrials) and GT (Consumer Cyclical) and ASTE (Industrials) and WMS (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ASTE pays a dividend while GTES, GT, WMS, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.