GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.5%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-27.2%
MAS
Masco Corporation
Construction
Market Cap$14.51B
5Y Perf.+53.8%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$78.98B
5Y Perf.+60.1%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$7.05B
5Y Perf.+114.6%
GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GTLS | FBIN | MAS | SHW | AWI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Construction | Construction | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction |
| Market Cap | $9.93B | $4.68B | $14.51B | $78.98B | $7.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.26B | $3.36B | $7.68B | $23.94B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $195M | $837M | $2.60B | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 45.6% | 35.4% | 49.1% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 10.6% | 16.8% | 16.1% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 11.6x | 16.8x | 27.0x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.74B | $2.54B | $3.44B | $14.53B | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $264M | $647M | $207M | $113M |
GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GTLS
FBIN
MAS
SHW
AWI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.5 | +428.5% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 160.1 | +60.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 214.6 | +114.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AWI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chart Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. FBIN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
GTLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs AWI's 330.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
- Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61
- +37.6% vs FBIN's -16.8%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
FBIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.61, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 19.5x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0%
Best for: defensive
MAS
Masco Corporation
The Value Pick
MAS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 3.38 vs SHW's 3.90
Best for: valuation efficiency
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Income Pick
SHW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 1.0%
Best for: income & stability
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
- 18.6% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
- 16.0% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs 7.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AWI | 12.1% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 19.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | AWI | 18.6% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GTLS | +37.6% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AWI | 16.0% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs 7.4% |
GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAWILAGGINGSHW
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • MAS leads 0 • SHW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓SHWThe Sherwin-Williams …
0leads
MASMasco Corporation
0leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
1leads
AWIArmstrong World Indus…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GTLSvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AWI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AWI6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AWI3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.9B annually — 14.5x AWI's $1.6B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $3.4B | $7.7B | $23.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $644M | $482M | $1.4B | $4.5B | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $195M | $837M | $2.6B | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $203M | $420M | $943M | $2.9B | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +45.6% | +35.4% | +49.1% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +10.6% | +16.8% | +16.1% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +5.8% | +10.9% | +10.9% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +12.5% | +12.3% | +12.1% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -106.4% | +6.5% | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | -2.0% | +20.7% | +7.5% | -1.9% |
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MAS offers better value at 3.76x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.9B | $4.7B | $14.5B | $79.0B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $7.0B | $17.3B | $93.3B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 628.45x | 15.82x | 18.63x | 31.18x | 23.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.40x | 11.56x | 16.79x | 26.99x | 19.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.76x | 4.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.33x | 10.08x | 12.18x | 21.24x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.33x | 1.05x | 1.92x | 3.35x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 1.98x | 201.40x | 17.33x | 7.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.95x | 12.77x | 16.76x | 29.76x | 28.63x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. AWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +8.3% | +8.0% | +58.2% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.0% | +15.9% | +10.0% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +8.1% | +35.4% | +16.5% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +9.9% | +35.9% | +21.3% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 1.07x | 45.81x | 3.16x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $2.3B | $2.8B | $14.3B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $264M | $647M | $207M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $2.5B | $3.4B | $14.5B | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | 4.72x | 12.60x | 7.83x | 13.31x |
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, GTLS leads with a +37.6% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | -22.8% | +12.1% | -2.1% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.6% | -16.8% | +21.1% | -8.0% | +11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | -36.3% | +40.1% | +42.4% | +151.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.5% | -54.0% | +16.1% | +16.1% | +63.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +772.5% | -2.4% | +152.1% | +250.0% | +330.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | -13.9% | +11.9% | +12.5% | +36.0% |
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.61x | 1.28x | 0.80x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.51 | $64.84 | $79.19 | $379.65 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.50 | $36.07 | $58.16 | $301.58 | $148.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +60.3% | +90.8% | +84.3% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 46.8 | 59.6 | 47.6 | 41.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.6M | 2.7M | 1.6M | 494K |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GTLS as "Buy", FBIN as "Hold", MAS as "Buy", SHW as "Buy", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.4% upside for FBIN (target: $56) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $193.81 | $56.43 | $82.60 | $389.43 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 27 | 38 | 38 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.5% | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 12 | 37 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.00 | $1.24 | $3.17 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +3.9% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
Evenly matched — FBIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallArmstrong World Industries,… (AWI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GTLS vs FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Masco Corporation wins at 3. 38x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 90x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 7% versus FBIN's -4. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 226% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 38x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 90x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 0x for The Sherwin-Williams Company — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 44. 4% to $56. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is GTLS or FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, FBIN: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTLS and FBIN and MAS and SHW and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (GTLS (Industrials) and FBIN (Industrials) and MAS (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FBIN, MAS, SHW, AWI pay a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GTLS: -2.5% · FBIN: -106.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GTLS: 628.5x · FBIN: 15.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.