Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTLS vs HLIO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
GTLS vs HLIO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $9.94B | $2.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.26B | $839M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 27.6x |
| Total Debt | $3.74B | $111M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $73M |
GTLS vs HLIO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 529.3 | +429.3% |
| Helios Technologies… (HLIO) | 100 | 195.2 | +95.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTLS vs HLIO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs HLIO's 112.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 1.36x
HLIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 23.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.8%
- Beta 1.56, yield 0.5%, current ratio 2.90x
- 4.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 27.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs HLIO's 1.56 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.8% vs GTLS's +37.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 4.4% vs 7.4% |
GTLS vs HLIO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GTLS vs HLIO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLIO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 5.1x HLIO's $839M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.8% (HLIO) to 0.9% (GTLS). On growth, HLIO holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $839M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $644M | $129M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $203M | $103M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GTLS and HLIO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 48.1x trailing earnings, HLIO trades at a 92% valuation discount to GTLS's 629.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTLS's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HLIO's 18.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.9B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 629.58x | 48.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.43x | 27.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.35x | 18.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.33x | 2.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 2.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 49.04x | 22.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIO delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. HLIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIO scores 9/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $73M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $111M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | 3.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $13,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,592 for HLIO. Over the past 12 months, HLIO leads with a +158.8% total return vs GTLS's +37.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.7% vs HLIO's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.7% | +28.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.4% | +158.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | +14.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.2% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +740.5% | +112.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLIO's 1.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs HLIO's 91.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.51 | $76.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.50 | $27.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 350K |
Analyst Outlook
HLIO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTLS as "Buy" and HLIO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.3% upside for HLIO (target: $77) vs -6.7% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, HLIO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.52% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $193.81 | $77.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% |
HLIO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
GTLS vs HLIO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTLS or HLIO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) offers the better valuation at 48. 1x trailing P/E (27. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTLS or HLIO?
On trailing P/E, Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is the cheapest at 48. 1x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 629. 6x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTLS or HLIO?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +33. 2%, compared to -4. 1% for Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +740. 5% versus HLIO's +112. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTLS or HLIO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Helios Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning HLIO is approximately 179% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTLS or HLIO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Helios Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTLS or HLIO?
Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus 7. 9% for HLIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLIO leads at 32. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTLS or HLIO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 27. 6x for Helios Technologies, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLIO: 10. 3% to $77. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTLS or HLIO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) offers the highest yield at 0. 5%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is GTLS or HLIO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +740. 5% 10Y return). Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a higher beta of 1. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +740. 5%, HLIO: +112. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTLS and HLIO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HLIO pays a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.