GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+20.7%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.-15.3%
ESAB
ESAB Corporation
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$6.24B
5Y Perf.+104.8%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-38.4%
GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GTLS | HLIO | ESAB | FBIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Construction |
| Market Cap | $9.93B | $2.25B | $6.24B | $4.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.26B | $839M | $2.91B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $49M | $207M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 32.3% | 35.4% | 45.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 7.8% | 16.2% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 26.9x | 17.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.74B | $111M | $1.43B | $2.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $73M | $186M | $264M |
GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GTLS
HLIO
ESAB
FBIN
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| Helios Technologies… (HLIO) | 100 | 84.7 | -15.3% |
| ESAB Corporation (ESAB) | 100 | 204.8 | +104.8% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 61.6 | -38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HLIO and ESAB are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. ESAB Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. FBIN and GTLS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ESAB's 107.2%
- Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61
Best for: long-term compounding
HLIO
Helios Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play
HLIO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 23.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.56, Low D/E 11.9%, current ratio 2.90x
- PEG 1.00 vs FBIN's 2.77
- Beta 1.56, yield 0.5%, current ratio 2.90x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
ESAB
ESAB Corporation
The Income Pick
ESAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 0.4%
- 7.1% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
- 4.2% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 11.9% vs 7.4%
Best for: income & stability
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 17.7x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ESAB's 0.4%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | HLIO | 4.1% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 17.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | ESAB | 7.1% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ESAB's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HLIO | +134.6% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ESAB | 4.2% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 11.9% vs 7.4% |
GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGTLSLAGGINGHLIO
Who Leads Where
FBIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
ESAB leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • HLIO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓HLIOHelios Technologies, …
0leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
ESABESAB Corporation
1leads
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs ESABvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ESAB3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HLIO and ESAB and FBIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 5.1x HLIO's $839M. ESAB is the more profitable business, keeping 7.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, HLIO holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | ESABESAB Corporation | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $839M | $2.9B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $644M | $129M | $539M | $482M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $49M | $207M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $203M | $103M | $218M | $420M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +32.3% | +35.4% | +45.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +7.8% | +16.2% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +5.8% | +7.1% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +12.3% | +7.5% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +17.4% | +9.9% | -106.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | +3.1% | -29.1% | -2.0% |
Evenly matched — HLIO and ESAB and FBIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HLIO offers better value at 1.74x vs ESAB's 3.79x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | ESABESAB Corporation | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.9B | $2.3B | $6.2B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $2.3B | $7.5B | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 628.45x | 46.89x | 27.53x | 15.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.40x | 26.92x | 17.74x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.74x | 3.79x | 2.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.33x | 17.74x | 13.00x | 10.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.33x | 2.68x | 2.19x | 1.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 2.43x | 2.82x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.95x | 21.72x | 29.24x | 12.77x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HLIO and ESAB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ESAB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. HLIO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIO scores 9/9 vs ESAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | ESABESAB Corporation | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +5.3% | +9.5% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.1% | +4.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +4.4% | +11.9% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +4.8% | +13.1% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.12x | 0.65x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $38M | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $73M | $186M | $264M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $111M | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | 3.84x | 3.40x | 4.72x |
Evenly matched — HLIO and ESAB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESAB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESAB five years ago would be worth $20,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, HLIO leads with a +134.6% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESAB at 20.7% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | ESABESAB Corporation | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +24.7% | -8.9% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.6% | +134.6% | -15.8% | -16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.7% | +11.1% | +75.8% | -36.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.5% | -8.1% | +107.2% | -54.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +772.5% | +109.8% | +107.2% | -2.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +3.6% | +20.7% | -13.9% |
ESAB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | ESABESAB Corporation | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.56x | 1.24x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.51 | $76.47 | $137.42 | $64.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.50 | $28.34 | $89.41 | $36.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +88.9% | +74.5% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 55.2 | 50.7 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 350K | 612K | 2.6M |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ESAB and FBIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GTLS as "Buy", HLIO as "Buy", ESAB as "Buy", FBIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | HLIOHelios Technologi… | ESABESAB Corporation | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $193.81 | $77.00 | $146.67 | $59.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 12 | 10 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +0.5% | +0.4% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.36 | $0.36 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +5.3% |
Evenly matched — ESAB and FBIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
FBIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ESAB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Best OverallChart Industries, Inc. (GTLS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GTLS vs HLIO vs ESAB vs FBIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Helios Technologies, Inc. wins at 1. 00x versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 2. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN?
Over the past 5 years, ESAB Corporation (ESAB) delivered a total return of +107.
2%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 188% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Helios Technologies, Inc.
(HLIO) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Helios Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN?
ESAB Corporation (ESAB) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
0% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ESAB leads at 17. 3% versus 7. 9% for HLIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Helios Technologies, Inc. (HLIO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 00x versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 2. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 9x for Helios Technologies, Inc. — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 53. 1% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is GTLS or HLIO or ESAB or FBIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, ESAB: +107. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTLS and HLIO and ESAB and FBIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HLIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ESAB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. HLIO, FBIN pay a dividend while GTLS, ESAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GTLS: -2.5% · HLIO: 17.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GTLS: 628.5x · HLIO: 46.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.