Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GTX vs STRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
GTX vs STRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $5.09B | $312M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.71B | $580M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $343M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 16.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | 15.2x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $179M | $85M |
GTX vs STRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) | 100 | 522.8 | +422.8% |
| Strattec Security C… (STRT) | 100 | 578.0 | +478.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTX vs STRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, current ratio 0.97x
- Beta 1.51, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.97x
STRT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 12.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.7%
- 49.3% 10Y total return vs GTX's 42.7%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs GTX's 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs GTX's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.7% margin vs STRT's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs STRT's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +141.3% vs STRT's +120.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.3% ROA vs STRT's 6.4%, ROIC 59.1% vs 8.7% |
GTX vs STRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GTX vs STRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 4.7x STRT's $580M. GTX is the more profitable business, keeping 12.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRT's 4.3%. On growth, STRT holds the edge at -4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $580M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $440M | $33M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $343M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $409M | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.6% | +16.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.3% | -41.7% |
Valuation Metrics
STRT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, STRT trades at a 8% valuation discount to GTX's 17.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STRT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTX's 10.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $312M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $238M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.78x | 16.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.24x | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.84x | 6.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.93x | 4.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GTX and STRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.3% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +59.1% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +49.3% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$73M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $179M | $85M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.60x | 263.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GTX and STRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTX five years ago would be worth $48,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,680 for STRT. Over the past 12 months, GTX leads with a +141.3% total return vs STRT's +120.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STRT at 58.7% vs GTX's 50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +56.0% | -1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +141.3% | +120.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.7% | +299.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +381.9% | +66.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.7% | +49.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.2% | +58.7% |
Risk & Volatility
GTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTX is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STRT's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTX currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs STRT's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.79 | $92.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.57 | $33.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +80.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.4 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 85K |
Analyst Outlook
GTX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTX as "Hold" and STRT as "Hold". GTX is the only dividend payer here at 0.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% |
GTX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). STRT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
GTX vs STRT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTX or STRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTX or STRT?
On trailing P/E, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is the cheapest at 16.
3x versus Garrett Motion Inc. at 17. 8x. On forward P/E, Strattec Security Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTX or STRT?
Over the past 5 years, Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) delivered a total return of +381. 9%, compared to +66. 8% for Strattec Security Corporation (STRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STRT returned +49. 3% versus GTX's +42. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTX or STRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Strattec Security Corporation's 1. 53β — meaning STRT is approximately 1% more volatile than GTX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GTX or STRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus 3. 1% for Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Garrett Motion Inc. grew EPS 20. 6% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for Strattec Security Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRT leads at 7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTX or STRT?
Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 3. 3% for Strattec Security Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTX leads at 13. 8% versus 4. 0% for STRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTX leads at 24. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTX or STRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) trades at 11.
9x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for Garrett Motion Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTX or STRT?
In this comparison, GTX (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. STRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GTX or STRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Garrett Motion Inc.
(GTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 9% yield). Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTX: +42. 7%, STRT: +49. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTX and STRT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
GTX pays a dividend while STRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.