GTX vs STRT vs BWA vs ALSN

For growth investors, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is the stronger pick with 5.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is the cheapest at 16.

3x versus BorgWarner Inc. at 45. 5x. On forward P/E, Strattec Security Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Garrett Motion Inc. 's 1. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Garrett Motion Inc.

(GTX) delivered a total return of +381. 9%, compared to +28. 7% for BorgWarner Inc. (BWA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +377. 7% versus STRT's +25. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BorgWarner Inc.

(BWA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Garrett Motion Inc. 's 1. 56β — meaning GTX is approximately 51% more volatile than BWA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) is pulling ahead at 5.

1% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Garrett Motion Inc. grew EPS 20. 6% year-over-year, compared to -14. 7% for BorgWarner Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRT leads at 7. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 1. 9% for BorgWarner Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 4. 0% for STRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Garrett Motion Inc. 's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Strattec Security Corporation (STRT) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Garrett Motion Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWA: 20. 0% to $69. 80.

In this comparison, BWA (0.

9% yield), GTX (0. 9% yield), ALSN (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. STRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.

(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 0. 9% yield, +377. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +377. 7%, STRT: +25. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: GTX is a small-cap deep-value stock; STRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. GTX, BWA, ALSN pay a dividend while STRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.