Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals
GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals |
| Market Cap | $4M | $796M | $811M | $1.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $1.52B | $1.88B | $2.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $49M | $-134M | $-359M |
| Gross Margin | -82.1% | 10.8% | 10.1% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | -116.6% | 4.2% | -3.1% | -4.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $381M | $577M | $3.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $20M | $37M | $211M |
GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Kronos Worldwide, I… (KRO) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GURE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.52 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
ASIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.9%
- 0.3% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5%
- 3.2% margin vs GURE's -195.8%
- 2.9% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs -11.2%
KRO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs ASIX's 60.6%
- Beta 1.57, yield 2.8%, current ratio 2.70x
TROX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.6% yield, vs ASIX's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +76.9% vs GURE's -40.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.3% revenue growth vs GURE's -74.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs GURE's -195.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs ASIX's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.9% vs GURE's -40.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs GURE's -16.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs -11.2% |
GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ASIX leads in 2 of 6 categories
KRO leads 2 • GURE leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TROX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 209.8x GURE's $14M. ASIX is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GURE's -195.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $1.5B | $1.9B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $143M | -$9M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $49M | -$134M | -$359M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$498,990 | $6M | $35M | -$139M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -82.1% | +10.8% | +10.1% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -116.6% | +4.2% | -3.1% | -4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -195.8% | +3.2% | -7.1% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +0.4% | +1.9% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +9.4% | +4.1% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.1% | -8.8% | -126.1% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KRO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ASIX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRO's 40.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $796M | $811M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.07x | 13.34x | -7.34x | -2.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.74x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.10x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.86x | 40.71x | 16.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.52x | 0.44x | 0.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 0.80x | 1.08x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 124.10x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ASIX delivers a 6.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. GURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASIX scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.2% | +6.0% | -17.0% | -30.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.6% | +2.9% | -9.4% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.2% | +4.4% | -1.9% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.6% | +5.3% | -2.2% | -0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.47x | 0.77x | 2.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $361M | $540M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $20M | $37M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $381M | $577M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -268.95x | 7.92x | -2.32x | -1.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASIX five years ago would be worth $8,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $537 for GURE. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +76.9% total return vs GURE's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRO at -0.2% vs GURE's -50.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | +40.3% | +58.5% | +98.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.8% | +8.2% | -1.2% | +76.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -25.6% | -0.7% | -23.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | -15.9% | -43.9% | -55.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | +60.6% | +129.0% | +116.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.2% | -9.4% | -0.2% | -8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GURE and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GURE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs GURE's 30.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.81x | 1.57x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.83 | $26.73 | $7.90 | $10.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.04 | $14.10 | $4.08 | $2.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.5% | +89.8% | +89.2% | +79.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 60.6 | 63.4 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 453K | 350K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GURE and TROX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASIX as "Buy", KRO as "Hold", TROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -8.4% upside for ASIX (target: $22) vs -29.1% for KRO (target: $5). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs ASIX's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $5.00 | $7.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 7 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +2.8% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.63 | $0.20 | $0.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ASIX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KRO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
GURE vs ASIX vs KRO vs TROX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the stronger pick with 0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX?
Over the past 5 years, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) delivered a total return of -15. 9%, compared to -94. 6% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRO returned +129. 0% versus GURE's -95. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gulf Resources, Inc.
(GURE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 356% more volatile than GURE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is pulling ahead at 0. 3% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AdvanSix Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, KRO leads at -1. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX?
AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -769. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ASIX leads at 4. 4% versus -277. 8% for GURE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRO leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASIX: -8.
4% to $22. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX?
In this comparison, TROX (3.
6% yield), KRO (2. 8% yield), ASIX (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. GURE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GURE or ASIX or KRO or TROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 6% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASIX: +60. 6%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GURE and ASIX and KRO and TROX?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock. ASIX, KRO, TROX pay a dividend while GURE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.