Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Construction Materials
GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $6.18B | $5.86B | $112.65B | $37.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.64B | $7.49B | $29.99B | $8.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $248M | $1.12B | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 15.9% | 10.4% | 13.6% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 4.9% | 5.8% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 26.0x | 18.1x | 57.4x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.62B | $1.28B | $1.19B | $5.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $529M | $541M | $440M | $183M |
GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Granite Constructio… (GVA) | 100 | 802.7 | +702.7% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
| Vulcan Materials Co… (VMC) | 100 | 266.7 | +166.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GVA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- PEG 0.98 vs PWR's 3.33
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.40
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs PRIM's 402.0%
- 19.8% revenue growth vs VMC's 6.9%
- +132.1% vs VMC's +9.4%
VMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 0.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 63.3%, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.80, yield 0.7%, current ratio 2.69x
- 13.9% margin vs PRIM's 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% revenue growth vs VMC's 6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs PRIM's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.1% vs VMC's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs PWR's 4.8%, ROIC 8.8% vs 11.8% |
GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VMC leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 2 • PWR leads 1 • GVA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 6.5x GVA's $4.6B. VMC is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRIM's 3.3%. On growth, GVA holds the edge at +30.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $7.5B | $30.0B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $453M | $437M | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $248M | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $359M | $165M | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +10.4% | +13.6% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +4.9% | +5.8% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +3.3% | +3.7% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +2.2% | +5.6% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.4% | -5.4% | +26.3% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | -60.5% | +51.0% | +29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.2B | $5.9B | $112.7B | $37.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.3B | $6.6B | $113.4B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.92x | 21.52x | 110.40x | 35.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.00x | 18.06x | 57.40x | 31.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.17x | 6.40x | 2.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.13x | 13.03x | 45.68x | 18.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.40x | 0.77x | 3.97x | 4.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.14x | 3.52x | 12.61x | 4.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.69x | 17.20x | 69.50x | 33.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GVA delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $13 for PWR. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GVA's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VMC scores 9/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | +15.2% | +13.0% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +5.6% | +4.8% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +13.6% | +11.8% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +16.3% | +11.3% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.76x | 0.13x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $735M | $748M | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $529M | $541M | $440M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.49x | 21.02x | 6.27x | 4.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $75,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,528 for VMC. Over the past 12 months, PWR leads with a +132.1% total return vs VMC's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 64.7% vs VMC's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.2% | -17.2% | +70.8% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.7% | +62.4% | +132.1% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +302.6% | +346.5% | +345.2% | +52.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.4% | +234.4% | +651.1% | +55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +238.3% | +402.0% | +3143.9% | +162.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.1% | +64.7% | +64.5% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GVA and VMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GVA currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.83x | 1.30x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $145.00 | $205.50 | $788.72 | $331.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.99 | $65.23 | $315.45 | $252.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +52.6% | +95.2% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.0 | 30.3 | 87.0 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 543K | 1.1M | 1.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
VMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GVA as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy", PWR as "Buy", VMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -13.8% for PWR (target: $647). For income investors, VMC offers the higher dividend yield at 0.68% vs PRIM's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $143.50 | $160.63 | $647.23 | $327.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 22 | 35 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +0.3% | +0.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $0.32 | $0.40 | $1.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
VMC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PRIM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
GVA vs PRIM vs PWR vs VMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Granite Construction Incorporated (GVA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to +55. 3% for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus VMC's +162. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 129% more volatile than VMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 133% for Granite Construction Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 6. 9% for Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Primoris Services Corporation grew EPS 51. 7% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRIM leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC?
Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Quanta Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VMC leads at 20. 1% versus 5. 5% for PRIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VMC leads at 27. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC?
In this comparison, VMC (0.
7% yield), GVA (0. 3% yield), PRIM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PWR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is GVA or PRIM or PWR or VMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 0. 7% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VMC: +162. 5%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GVA and PRIM and PWR and VMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (GVA (Industrials) and PRIM (Industrials) and PWR (Industrials) and VMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VMC pays a dividend while GVA, PRIM, PWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.