Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $61M | $589M | $4.83B | $8M | $9.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $164M | $907M | $115M | $647M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $137M | $-1.31B | $-53M | $-867M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 61.9% | -47.7% | 64.3% | -15.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 16.8% | -90.6% | -44.2% | -61.8% |
| Forward P/E | 45.8x | 9.2x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $41K | $14M | $3.65B | $46M | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $95M | $547M | $847K | $234M |
GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Globavend Holdings … (GVH) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 192.1 | +92.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GVH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.27
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 1.96x
- Beta 0.27, current ratio 1.96x
- Beta 0.27 vs RIOT's 3.87, lower leverage
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GVH's -11.0%
- Better valuation composite
MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, AIXI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RIOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
- +207.5% vs GVH's -97.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs GVH's -11.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs RIOT's 3.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.5% vs GVH's -97.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 66.8% vs -34.4% |
GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GVH leads 1 • RIOT leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 39.0x GVH's $23M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%. On growth, GVH holds the edge at -10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $164M | $907M | $115M | $647M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $166M | $627M | -$49M | -$450M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $137M | -$1.3B | -$53M | -$867M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$448M | -$312M | -$2M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +61.9% | -47.7% | +64.3% | -15.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +16.8% | -90.6% | -44.2% | -61.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +17.3% | -144.6% | -45.9% | -102.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -65.3% | -34.4% | -2.0% | -119.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.8% | — | — | -64.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.0% | +2.8% | -4.8% | -29.9% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BTBT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, BTBT trades at a 80% valuation discount to GVH's 45.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GVH's 41.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $61M | $589M | $4.8B | $8M | $9.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $59M | $508M | $7.9B | $53M | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 45.80x | 9.15x | -3.44x | -0.45x | -12.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 41.87x | 8.49x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.69x | 3.60x | 5.32x | 0.11x | 14.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.52x | 0.56x | 1.30x | — | 2.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GVH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GVH delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. GVH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GVH scores 6/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +21.4% | -30.5% | — | -28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.1% | +19.0% | -17.1% | -65.3% | -21.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +66.8% | +6.5% | -9.0% | -34.4% | -8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +46.6% | +8.5% | -12.1% | -3.4% | -11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.03x | 1.05x | — | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$81M | $3.1B | $45M | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $95M | $547M | $846,593 | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $41,019 | $14M | $3.6B | $46M | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 821.18x | — | 4.73x | -14.13x | -16.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RIOT five years ago would be worth $7,221 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $79 for GVH. Over the past 12 months, RIOT leads with a +207.5% total return vs GVH's -97.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RIOT at 32.0% vs GVH's -80.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +196.4% | -10.3% | +28.2% | +68.1% | +70.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.4% | -9.0% | -4.7% | -79.2% | +207.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -19.7% | +36.1% | -98.6% | +129.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -84.6% | -59.5% | -98.6% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -60.4% | -51.6% | -98.6% | +787.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.1% | -7.1% | +10.8% | -75.9% | +32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GVH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GVH is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs GVH's 1.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 3.37x | 3.11x | 0.94x | 3.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $364.00 | $4.55 | $23.45 | $4.02 | $24.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $1.25 | $6.66 | $0.08 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.1% | +40.2% | +54.2% | +18.0% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 69.1 | 69.6 | 49.3 | 74.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 800K | 18.5M | 47.6M | 60.6M | 18.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GVH and RIOT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $16.13 | — | $27.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 19 | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GVH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
GVH vs BTBT vs MARA vs AIXI vs RIOT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT?
On trailing P/E, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Globavend Holdings Limited at 45. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT?
Over the past 5 years, Riot Platforms, Inc.
(RIOT) delivered a total return of -27. 8%, compared to -99. 2% for Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus GVH's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 1327% more volatile than GVH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -11. 0% for Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. GVH, MARA, AIXI, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GVH or BTBT or MARA or AIXI or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Globavend Holdings Limited (GVH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GVH: -99. 2%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GVH and BTBT and MARA and AIXI and RIOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GVH (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and AIXI (Technology) and RIOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GVH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.