Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Telecommunications Services
GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $10M | $607.77B | $21.96B | $18M | $10.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $72M | $71M | $51M | $283M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-6M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | -29.0% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 32.1% | 40.9% |
| Operating Margin | -46.2% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -1.9% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.5x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $4M | $8.76B | $32M | $16M | $546M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $1M | $447M |
GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 23.5 | -76.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 741.2 | +641.2% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1699.6 | +1599.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GWH plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 204.0%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs GWH's -74.9%
Among these 5 stocks, FLUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GSAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.04, yield 0.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, current ratio 2.42x
- Beta 2.04, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.42x
- -5.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs GWH's -74.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -5.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs SPIR's 3.10 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.6% vs GWH's -64.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs GWH's -103.5%, ROIC 2.3% vs -5.5% |
GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GSAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • GWH leads 0 • SPIR leads 0 • FLUX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GSAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GSAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $283M annually — 254.5x GWH's $1M. GSAT is the more profitable business, keeping -5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $72M | $71M | $51M | $283M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$47M | -$74M | -$237M | -$212,000 | $108M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$6M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | -$7M | $45M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -29.0% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +32.1% | +40.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.2% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -1.9% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -40.8% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -12.5% | -5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.1% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -14.7% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.6% | -26.9% | +27.3% | -60.6% | +16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.0% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -25.0% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GWH and FLUX and GSAT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $607.8B | $22.0B | $18M | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$806,678 | $591.7B | $19.7B | $32M | $10.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.18x | 11.48x | -56.01x | -2.52x | -547.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 104.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.21x | 8493.94x | 309.69x | 0.27x | 38.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 5.23x | 6.53x | — | 29.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 137.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GSAT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSAT delivers a -3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-9 for GWH. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GSAT's 1.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUX scores 6/9 vs GWH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.3% | -88.4% | -21.1% | -7.4% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -103.5% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -21.0% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.5% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -30.1% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -158.9% | -0.1% | -10.0% | — | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.08x | 0.01x | — | 1.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $15M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $1M | $447M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $8.8B | $32M | $16M | $546M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.75x | 9.20x | -21.20x | -1.19x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $97,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $53 for GWH. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +306.6% total return vs GWH's -64.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 145.9% vs GWH's -63.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -61.2% | +136.7% | -10.1% | -28.9% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -64.5% | +93.8% | +197.2% | -48.7% | +306.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | +242.0% | +1386.1% | -73.7% | +488.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -76.6% | +872.1% | -88.4% | +402.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -75.7% | +668.2% | -76.0% | +204.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.7% | +50.7% | +145.9% | -35.9% | +80.5% |
Risk & Volatility
GSAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GSAT is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs GWH's 5.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.46x | 3.10x | 2.83x | 2.23x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.87 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $7.55 | $82.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $0.91 | $17.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.6% | +78.4% | +57.8% | +13.4% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 47.7 | 38.1 | 54.8 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 659K | 1.6M | 15.1M | 127K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GWH as "Hold", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 385.8% upside for GWH (target: $4) vs -19.6% for GSAT (target: $66). GSAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.79 | $17.25 | $103.65 | — | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 | 7 | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GSAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
GWH vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FLUX vs GSAT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 9% for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +872. 1%, compared to -99. 5% for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +668. 2% versus GWH's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 52% more volatile than GSAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 154% for Globalstar, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -74. 9% for ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to 20. 0% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -40. 1% for ESS Tech, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GSAT leads at 5. 4% versus -35. 2% for GWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 64. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT?
In this comparison, GSAT (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. GWH, SPIR, ASTS, FLUX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is GWH or SPIR or ASTS or FLUX or GSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+668. 2% 10Y return). ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ASTS: +668. 2%, GWH: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between GWH and SPIR and ASTS and FLUX and GSAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (GWH (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and FLUX (Industrials) and GSAT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.