Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HAL vs XOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HAL
Halliburton Company

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$33.74B
5Y Perf.+243.8%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$629.60B
5Y Perf.+226.7%

HAL vs XOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HAL logoHAL
XOM logoXOM
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$33.74B$629.60B
Revenue (TTM)$22.17B$323.90B
Net Income (TTM)$1.54B$28.84B
Gross Margin15.3%21.7%
Operating Margin11.3%10.5%
Forward P/E17.4x15.0x
Total Debt$8.13B$43.54B
Cash & Equiv.$2.21B$10.68B

HAL vs XOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HAL
XOM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Halliburton Company (HAL)100343.8+243.8%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100326.7+226.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HAL vs XOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: XOM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Halliburton Company is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Growth Play

HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 0.57, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Pick

XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 26 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.7%
  • 107.4% 10Y total return vs HAL's 17.2%
  • Lower P/E (15.0x vs 17.4x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHAL logoHAL-3.3% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5%
ValueXOM logoXOMLower P/E (15.0x vs 17.4x)
Quality / MarginsXOM logoXOM8.9% margin vs HAL's 6.9%
Stability / SafetyXOM logoXOMLower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 77.4%)
DividendsXOM logoXOM2.7% yield, 26-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.7%
Momentum (1Y)HAL logoHAL+111.3% vs XOM's +45.7%
Efficiency (ROA)XOM logoXOM6.4% ROA vs HAL's 6.1%, ROIC 8.6% vs 10.2%

HAL vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HALHalliburton Company
FY 2025
Completion And Production
57.6%$12.8B
Drilling And Evaluation
42.4%$9.4B
XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B

HAL vs XOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXOMLAGGINGHAL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 14.6x HAL's $22.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.9% (XOM) to 6.9% (HAL).

MetricHAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$22.2B$323.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.4B$59.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.5B$28.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.7B$23.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+15.3%+21.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.3%+10.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.6%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.3%-1.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.2%-11.0%
HAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 22.2x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 18% valuation discount to HAL's 26.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, XOM's 11.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HAL's 11.7x.

MetricHAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$33.7B$629.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$39.7B$662.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS26.93x22.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.39x15.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.68x11.05x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.52x1.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.23x2.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.18x26.66x
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAL scores 5/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricHAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.6%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.1%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.2%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.6%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.77x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.9B$32.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.2B$10.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8.1B$43.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.19x69.44x
HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $27,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,477 for HAL. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +111.3% total return vs XOM's +45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.7% vs HAL's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.0%+22.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+111.3%+45.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+41.6%+46.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+94.8%+171.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+17.2%+107.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.3%+13.7%
XOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HAL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAL's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAL currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$42.46$176.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.22$101.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.1%+84.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.853.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded15.0M18.8M
Evenly matched — HAL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates HAL as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -8.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, XOM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.69% vs HAL's 1.71%.

MetricHAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$37.08$160.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts6455
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises426
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.69$4.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.0%+3.2%
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

XOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HAL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallExxon Mobil Corporation (XOM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HAL vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HAL or XOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger pick with -3.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Halliburton Company (HAL) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HAL or XOM?

On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 22.

2x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 9x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HAL or XOM?

Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +171.

8%, compared to +94. 8% for Halliburton Company (HAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +107. 4% versus HAL's +17. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HAL or XOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Halliburton Company's 0. 57β — meaning HAL is approximately -491% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HAL or XOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halliburton Company (HAL) is pulling ahead at -3.

3% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAL leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HAL or XOM?

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

9% net margin versus 5. 8% for Halliburton Company — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus 10. 2% for HAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HAL or XOM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.

0x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for Halliburton Company — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HAL or XOM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 7% for Halliburton Company (HAL).

09

Is HAL or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, HAL: +17. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HAL and XOM?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

HAL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HAL and XOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HAL: -0.3% · XOM: -1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(HAL: 6.9% · XOM: 8.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HAL: 26.9x · XOM: 22.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.