Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Home Improvement
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Distribution | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $3.15B | $6.86B | $14M | $301M | $2.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.15B | $5.36B | $1.21B | $458M | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $406M | $-275M | $22M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 29.7% | 34.5% | 23.2% | 22.5% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | 10.9% | -0.2% | 6.1% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.4x | 17.0x | — | 11.9x | 18.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $349M | $1.01B | $59M | $1.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $330M | $105M | $64M | $40M | $26M |
HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hayward Holdings, I… (HAYW) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
| Pool Corporation (POOL) | 100 | 54.5 | -45.5% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 157.8 | +57.8% |
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 169.2 | +69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HAYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 2.94x
- PEG 0.12 vs POOL's 4.38
- 14.0% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
POOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.7%
- 2.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 11.3% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 22.3% vs 1.6%
Among these 5 stocks, LESL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 18.3x)
- +77.4% vs LESL's -88.2%
PATK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 384.4% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 55.0%
- Beta 0.93, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.93 vs LESL's 2.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 18.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.0% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs LESL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.4% vs LESL's -88.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 22.3% vs 1.6% |
HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories
POOL leads 2 • HAYW leads 1 • LESL leads 0 • PATK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAYW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POOL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 11.7x FLXS's $458M. HAYW is the more profitable business, keeping 14.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, HAYW holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $5.4B | $1.2B | $458M | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $301M | $636M | $6M | $31M | $445M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $406M | -$275M | $22M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $80M | $605M | $8M | $28M | $194M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.0% | +29.7% | +34.5% | +23.2% | +22.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +10.9% | -0.2% | +6.1% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +7.6% | -22.7% | +4.8% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +11.3% | +0.6% | +6.1% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +6.2% | -16.0% | +9.8% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.3% | +2.1% | -85.8% | -27.2% | -0.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 31% valuation discount to PATK's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAYW offers better value at 0.15x vs POOL's 4.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $6.9B | $14M | $301M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $7.1B | $962M | $320M | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.38x | 17.24x | -0.06x | 15.84x | 23.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.37x | 16.99x | — | 11.86x | 18.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | 4.44x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.64x | 11.25x | 20.27x | 10.57x | 10.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.81x | 1.30x | 0.01x | 0.68x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.03x | 5.88x | — | 1.90x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.97x | 22.18x | — | 8.91x | 12.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POOL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POOL delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAYW. HAYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LESL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +32.2% | — | +12.2% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +11.3% | -42.4% | +7.5% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | +22.3% | +1.6% | +9.9% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +22.0% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.29x | — | 0.35x | 1.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$316M | $244M | $948M | $19M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $330M | $105M | $64M | $40M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $349M | $1.0B | $59M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.07x | 12.20x | -3.06x | 380.21x | 3.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PATK five years ago would be worth $15,433 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.4% total return vs LESL's -88.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.1% vs LESL's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | -18.0% | -11.6% | +41.4% | -18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.5% | -37.3% | -88.2% | +77.4% | +10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.4% | -43.1% | -99.3% | +245.3% | +113.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | -52.8% | -99.7% | +19.0% | +54.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.5% | +149.0% | -99.6% | +55.0% | +384.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.5% | -17.2% | -80.9% | +51.1% | +28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLXS and PATK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PATK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.00x | 2.20x | 1.51x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.73 | $345.00 | $18.56 | $59.95 | $148.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.04 | $186.95 | $0.87 | $29.38 | $80.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.0% | +54.2% | +8.2% | +93.8% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.2 | 37.2 | 48.2 | 60.9 | 23.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 749K | 133K | 47K | 458K |
Analyst Outlook
POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAYW as "Hold", POOL as "Buy", PATK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.3% upside for POOL (target: $279) vs -3.9% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, POOL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs FLXS's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.75 | $279.29 | — | $54.00 | $126.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 21 | — | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | — | +1.1% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.96 | — | $0.63 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +5.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +1.1% |
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). POOL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pool Corporation (POOL) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Pool Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?
Over the past 5 years, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) delivered a total return of +54. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PATK returned +407. 9% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 136% more volatile than PATK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus 1. 1% for LESL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAYW leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Pool Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Patrick Industries, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POOL: 49. 3% to $279. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?
In this comparison, POOL (2.
7% yield), PATK (1. 8% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HAYW, LESL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.
(PATK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 8% yield, +407. 9% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PATK: +407. 9%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HAYW and POOL and LESL and FLXS and PATK?
These companies operate in different sectors (HAYW (Industrials) and POOL (Industrials) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and PATK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POOL, FLXS, PATK pay a dividend while HAYW, LESL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.