Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.15B
5Y Perf.-11.6%
POOL
Pool Corporation

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.86B
5Y Perf.-45.5%
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$301M
5Y Perf.+57.8%
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+69.2%

HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HAYW logoHAYW
POOL logoPOOL
LESL logoLESL
FLXS logoFLXS
PATK logoPATK
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsIndustrial - DistributionHome ImprovementFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$3.15B$6.86B$14M$301M$2.99B
Revenue (TTM)$1.15B$5.36B$1.21B$458M$3.94B
Net Income (TTM)$161M$406M$-275M$22M$136M
Gross Margin45.0%29.7%34.5%23.2%22.5%
Operating Margin21.3%10.9%-0.2%6.1%7.0%
Forward P/E17.4x17.0x11.9x18.3x
Total Debt$13M$349M$1.01B$59M$1.64B
Cash & Equiv.$330M$105M$64M$40M$26M

HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HAYW
POOL
LESL
FLXS
PATK
StockMar 21May 26Return
Hayward Holdings, I… (HAYW)10088.4-11.6%
Pool Corporation (POOL)10054.5-45.5%
Leslie's, Inc. (LESL)1000.3-99.7%
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100157.8+57.8%
Patrick Industries,… (PATK)100169.2+69.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLXS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Pool Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. HAYW and PATK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HAYW
Hayward Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HAYW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 2.94x
  • PEG 0.12 vs POOL's 4.38
  • 14.0% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
POOL
Pool Corporation
The Income Pick

POOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.7%
  • 2.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 11.3% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 22.3% vs 1.6%
Best for: income & stability
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LESL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
  • 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
  • Lower P/E (11.9x vs 18.3x)
  • +77.4% vs LESL's -88.2%
Best for: growth exposure
PATK
Patrick Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

PATK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 384.4% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 55.0%
  • Beta 0.93, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.51x
  • Beta 0.93 vs LESL's 2.20
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLXS logoFLXS6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
ValueFLXS logoFLXSLower P/E (11.9x vs 18.3x)
Quality / MarginsHAYW logoHAYW14.0% margin vs LESL's -22.7%
Stability / SafetyPATK logoPATKBeta 0.93 vs LESL's 2.20
DividendsPOOL logoPOOL2.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLXS logoFLXS+77.4% vs LESL's -88.2%
Efficiency (ROA)POOL logoPOOL11.3% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 22.3% vs 1.6%

HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HAYWHayward Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Residential Pool
90.0%$1.0B
Commercial Pool
5.8%$65M
Flow Control
4.2%$47M
POOLPool Corporation
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$5.3B
LESLLeslie's, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M
PATKPatrick Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Manufactured Housing
31.3%$681M
Marine
27.9%$606M
Industrial
23.1%$503M
Powersports
17.7%$384M

HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPOOLLAGGINGPATK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HAYW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

POOL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 11.7x FLXS's $458M. HAYW is the more profitable business, keeping 14.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, HAYW holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHAYW logoHAYWHayward Holdings,…POOL logoPOOLPool CorporationLESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$5.4B$1.2B$458M$3.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$301M$636M$6M$31M$445M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$161M$406M-$275M$22M$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$80M$605M$8M$28M$194M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.0%+29.7%+34.5%+23.2%+22.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.3%+10.9%-0.2%+6.1%+7.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.0%+7.6%-22.7%+4.8%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.0%+11.3%+0.6%+6.1%+4.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.5%+6.2%-16.0%+9.8%-0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+70.3%+2.1%-85.8%-27.2%-0.9%
HAYW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.8x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 31% valuation discount to PATK's 23.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HAYW offers better value at 0.15x vs POOL's 4.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHAYW logoHAYWHayward Holdings,…POOL logoPOOLPool CorporationLESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$6.9B$14M$301M$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.8B$7.1B$962M$320M$4.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.38x17.24x-0.06x15.84x23.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.37x16.99x11.86x18.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.15x4.44x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.64x11.25x20.27x10.57x10.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.81x1.30x0.01x0.68x0.76x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.03x5.88x1.90x2.63x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.97x22.18x8.91x12.14x
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

POOL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

POOL delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAYW. HAYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LESL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHAYW logoHAYWHayward Holdings,…POOL logoPOOLPool CorporationLESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.3%+32.2%+12.2%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.2%+11.3%-42.4%+7.5%+4.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.2%+22.3%+1.6%+9.9%+7.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.6%+22.0%+2.1%+12.3%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976486
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.29x0.35x1.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$316M$244M$948M$19M$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$330M$105M$64M$40M$26M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$349M$1.0B$59M$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.07x12.20x-3.06x380.21x3.40x
POOL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PATK five years ago would be worth $15,433 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +77.4% total return vs LESL's -88.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 51.1% vs LESL's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHAYW logoHAYWHayward Holdings,…POOL logoPOOLPool CorporationLESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.8%-18.0%-11.6%+41.4%-18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.5%-37.3%-88.2%+77.4%+10.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+17.4%-43.1%-99.3%+245.3%+113.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.7%-52.8%-99.7%+19.0%+54.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.5%+149.0%-99.6%+55.0%+384.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.5%-17.2%-80.9%+51.1%+28.7%
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLXS and PATK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PATK is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHAYW logoHAYWHayward Holdings,…POOL logoPOOLPool CorporationLESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x1.00x2.20x1.51x0.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.73$345.00$18.56$59.95$148.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.04$186.95$0.87$29.38$80.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.0%+54.2%+8.2%+93.8%+60.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.237.248.260.923.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.3M749K133K47K458K
Evenly matched — FLXS and PATK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HAYW as "Hold", POOL as "Buy", PATK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.3% upside for POOL (target: $279) vs -3.9% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, POOL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.65% vs FLXS's 1.11%.

MetricHAYW logoHAYWHayward Holdings,…POOL logoPOOLPool CorporationLESL logoLESLLeslie's, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…PATK logoPATKPatrick Industrie…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.75$279.29$54.00$126.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts102117
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+1.1%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.96$0.63$1.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+5.0%0.0%+0.9%+1.1%
POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). POOL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallPool Corporation (POOL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HAYW vs POOL vs LESL vs FLXS vs PATK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pool Corporation (POOL) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?

On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Patrick Industries, Inc. at 23. 1x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hayward Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Pool Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?

Over the past 5 years, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) delivered a total return of +54. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PATK returned +407. 9% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 136% more volatile than PATK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?

Hayward Holdings, Inc.

(HAYW) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAYW leads at 21. 1% versus 1. 1% for LESL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAYW leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Hayward Holdings, Inc. (HAYW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Pool Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Patrick Industries, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POOL: 49. 3% to $279. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK?

In this comparison, POOL (2.

7% yield), PATK (1. 8% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. HAYW, LESL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HAYW or POOL or LESL or FLXS or PATK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patrick Industries, Inc.

(PATK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 8% yield, +407. 9% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PATK: +407. 9%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HAYW and POOL and LESL and FLXS and PATK?

These companies operate in different sectors (HAYW (Industrials) and POOL (Industrials) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and PATK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HAYW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POOL, FLXS, PATK pay a dividend while HAYW, LESL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HAYW

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POOL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LESL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PATK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HAYW and POOL and LESL and FLXS and PATK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HAYW: 11.5% · POOL: 6.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(HAYW: 14.0% · POOL: 7.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HAYW: 21.4x · POOL: 17.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.