Copper
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
HBM vs FCX vs TECK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Industrial Materials
HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $9.46B | $87.11B | $29.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.22B | $26.42B | $12.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $570M | $2.73B | $1.85B |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 27.8% | 30.3% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | 27.8% | 23.9% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 22.4x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.09B | $11.50B | $10.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $568M | $3.35B | $5.01B |
HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 883.3 | +783.3% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 668.2 | +568.2% |
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 640.1 | +540.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBM vs FCX vs TECK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 25.8% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
- +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1%
TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs HBM's 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
- Beta 1.73, yield 0.6%, current ratio 2.54x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.8% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.73 vs HBM's 1.91 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.8% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs 4.4% |
HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 11.9x HBM's $2.2B. HBM is the more profitable business, keeping 25.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $26.4B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $9.6B | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $570M | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $215M | $6.2B | $482M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +27.8% | +30.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +27.8% | +23.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +10.3% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +23.6% | +3.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.0% | +12.2% | +72.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +154.2% | +128.8% |
Valuation Metrics
HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBM's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TECK's 12.3x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $87.1B | $29.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $95.3B | $33.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.34x | 39.88x | 29.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.31x | 22.41x | 12.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.77x | 11.16x | 12.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.30x | 3.38x | 3.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.93x | 2.84x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.82x | 78.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HBM delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. HBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TECK's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TECK scores 6/9 vs FCX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.2% | +8.9% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.8% | +4.7% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.0% | +12.8% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +12.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.37x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $524M | $8.1B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $568M | $3.4B | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $11.5B | $10.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.44x | 17.68x | 4.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HBM five years ago would be worth $25,920 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +219.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.2% vs TECK's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.7% | +17.3% | +26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +219.0% | +65.3% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +350.8% | +70.7% | +40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +159.2% | +44.3% | +147.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +552.2% | +507.7% | +599.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +65.2% | +19.5% | +12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
TECK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TECK is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs HBM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 1.79x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.74 | $70.97 | $63.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.42 | $35.15 | $30.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +85.4% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 49.1 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.3M | 15.4M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBM as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.5% upside for FCX (target: $67) vs -56.6% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, FCX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.99% vs TECK's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.34 | $67.00 | $64.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.0% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | $0.60 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +2.5% |
HBM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TECK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
HBM vs FCX vs TECK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBM or FCX or TECK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBM or FCX or TECK?
On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBM or FCX or TECK?
Over the past 5 years, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) delivered a total return of +159. 2%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +599. 3% versus FCX's +507. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBM or FCX or TECK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 10% more volatile than TECK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 40% for Teck Resources Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBM or FCX or TECK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.
6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBM or FCX or TECK?
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBM leads at 25. 5% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBM leads at 29. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBM or FCX or TECK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13.
0x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCX: 10. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBM or FCX or TECK?
In this comparison, FCX (1.
0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HBM or FCX or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
6% yield, +599. 3% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +599. 3%, HBM: +552. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBM and FCX and TECK?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FCX, TECK pay a dividend while HBM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.