Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.01B | $1.02B | $4.83B | $20.26B | $9.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $96M | $351M | $826M | $11.66B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $58M | $254M | $2.67B | $519M |
| Gross Margin | -25.0% | 63.2% | 71.8% | 37.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | -203.2% | 21.3% | 37.5% | 17.9% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 13.8x | 16.5x | 6.2x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $404M | $117M | $22M | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $67M | $205M | $1.08B | $599M | $102M |
HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Bancorp, In… (HBNC) | 100 | 184.8 | +84.8% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 231.6 | +131.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HBNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 128.4% 10Y total return vs MOFG's 96.2%
- NIM 3.6% vs MOFG's 2.5%
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +71.2% vs FIS's -49.4%
FFIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and quality.
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0%
- 30.7% margin vs HBNC's -154.3%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- PEG 0.26 vs FFIN's 3.67
- Lower P/E (6.2x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.86
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8%
JKHY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.10, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.10 vs MOFG's 1.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HBNC's -71.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 18.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 1.86 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs HBNC's -154.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs MOFG's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.2% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs HBNC's -2.2%, ROIC 21.0% vs -9.3% |
HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • MOFG leads 1 • HBNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 121.3x HBNC's $96M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBNC's -154.3%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $96M | $351M | $826M | $11.7B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$186M | $74M | $320M | $4.1B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $58M | $254M | $2.7B | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $79M | $283M | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -25.0% | +63.2% | +71.8% | +37.6% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +21.3% | +37.5% | +17.9% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -154.3% | +16.7% | +30.7% | +22.9% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +68.5% | +22.5% | +34.3% | +23.9% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +113.6% | -7.7% | +30.6% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, FFIN trades at a 64% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JKHY offers better value at 2.04x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $1.0B | $4.8B | $20.3B | $9.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $929M | $3.8B | $23.7B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.27x | -13.93x | 19.01x | 52.27x | 20.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.40x | 13.77x | 16.54x | 6.24x | 18.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.22x | 2.14x | 2.04x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.79x | 6.50x | 11.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.81x | 4.94x | 5.85x | 1.90x | 3.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.50x | 2.52x | 1.46x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.29x | 16.74x | 15.72x | 7.21x | 15.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-15 for HBNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBNC's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.7% | +10.0% | +14.2% | +18.4% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +0.9% | +1.7% | +7.5% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.3% | -9.4% | +12.4% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -9.5% | +16.6% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.21x | 0.01x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $338M | -$88M | -$1.1B | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $67M | $205M | $1.1B | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $404M | $117M | $22M | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | 0.67x | 1.54x | 21.16x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MOFG five years ago would be worth $17,984 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +71.2% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 33.6% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +30.2% | +13.5% | -38.9% | -27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | +71.2% | -5.5% | -49.4% | -27.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +138.2% | +24.3% | -18.9% | -15.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.7% | +79.8% | -25.9% | -67.3% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +128.4% | +96.2% | +136.4% | -25.6% | +74.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | +33.6% | +7.5% | -6.8% | -5.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HBNC and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HBNC currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.34x | 0.78x | 0.61x | 0.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $49.69 | $38.74 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.34 | $26.52 | $28.11 | $37.91 | $124.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +99.2% | +86.9% | +47.4% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 74.9 | 61.3 | 30.8 | 27.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 0 | 683K | 5.6M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HBNC as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs JKHY's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $31.25 | $39.25 | $62.88 | $194.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 8 | 15 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.0% | +2.2% | +4.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $0.97 | $0.74 | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +7.0% | +0.4% |
FFIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HBNC vs MOFG vs FFIN vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.
(MOFG) delivered a total return of +79. 8%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +136. 4% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 10β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MOFG is approximately 1192% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -71. 0% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. grew EPS 19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -493. 8% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus -145. 9% for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 37. 5% versus -193. 4% for HBNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 71. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY).
09Is HBNC or MOFG or FFIN or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 10), 1. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +74. 8%, MOFG: +96. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HBNC and MOFG and FFIN and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (HBNC (Financial Services) and MOFG (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.