Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Equipment & Services
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology | Medical - Equipment & Services | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $113M | $1.93B | $6.63B | $1.61B | $1.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $424M | $2.35B | $4.18B | $2.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-178M | $504M | $128M | $-1.82B | $-171M |
| Gross Margin | 48.7% | 76.2% | 69.7% | 34.2% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | -51.7% | 14.8% | 4.6% | -4.1% | -7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 11.9x | 51.5x | 5.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $20M | $269M | $1.12B | $3.97B | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $551M | $229M | $532M | $781M |
HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Catalyst, In… (HCAT) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 163.2 | +63.2% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
- 118.9% margin vs HCAT's -57.2%
- Beta 0.13 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs INVA's 94.9%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 9.8%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 51.5x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, TDOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs HCAT's -57.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.7% vs HCAT's -59.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs HCAT's -27.4%, ROIC 14.2% vs -32.9% |
HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories
HIMS leads 1 • PRGO leads 1 • HCAT leads 0 • TDOC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 13.4x HCAT's $311M. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCAT's -57.2%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $424M | $2.3B | $4.2B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$110M | $86M | $164M | $58M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$178M | $504M | $128M | -$1.8B | -$171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $181M | $73M | $108M | $251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.7% | +76.2% | +69.7% | +34.2% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -51.7% | +14.8% | +4.6% | -4.1% | -7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.2% | +118.9% | +5.5% | -43.5% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +42.8% | +3.1% | +2.6% | +10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | +10.6% | +28.4% | -7.2% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +4.0% | -27.3% | -56.4% | +32.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HCAT and PRGO and TDOC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, INVA trades at a 86% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $1.9B | $6.6B | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $1.7B | $7.5B | $5.1B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | 6.91x | 50.32x | -1.14x | -6.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.15x | 11.91x | 51.51x | 5.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.67x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.10x | 42.68x | 7.42x | 15.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.36x | 4.55x | 2.82x | 0.38x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.65x | 12.25x | 0.55x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.88x | 89.61x | 11.12x | 4.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-55 for HCAT. HCAT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCAT scores 6/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -54.7% | +46.5% | +23.7% | -50.7% | -12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.4% | +32.4% | +6.0% | -19.8% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.9% | +14.2% | +10.7% | +3.7% | -11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | +12.4% | +10.9% | +4.3% | -10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.23x | 2.07x | 1.35x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$282M | $892M | $3.4B | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $551M | $229M | $532M | $781M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $269M | $1.1B | $4.0B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.79x | 63.45x | — | -7.20x | -8.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $299 for HCAT. Over the past 12 months, INVA leads with a +21.7% total return vs HCAT's -59.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs HCAT's -49.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.3% | +14.7% | -23.2% | -13.5% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.9% | +21.7% | -51.0% | -51.2% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.9% | +95.2% | +116.6% | -58.1% | -73.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +94.4% | +137.6% | -60.1% | -95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | +94.9% | +161.9% | -77.7% | -41.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.2% | +25.0% | +29.4% | -25.2% | -35.6% |
Risk & Volatility
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs HCAT's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.05x | 0.13x | 2.40x | 1.18x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.06 | $25.15 | $70.43 | $28.44 | $9.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $16.52 | $13.74 | $9.23 | $4.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.4% | +90.7% | +36.4% | +41.2% | +71.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.9 | 39.9 | 54.5 | 60.9 | 74.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 720K | 621K | 34.9M | 3.4M | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
PRGO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HCAT as "Buy", INVA as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", PRGO as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.6% upside for PRGO (target: $20) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.50 | $37.67 | $29.67 | $20.00 | $7.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 10 | 19 | 36 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +0.2% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INVA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HIMS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
HCAT vs INVA vs HIMS vs PRGO vs TDOC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC?
On trailing P/E, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -97. 0% for Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus HCAT's -95. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 1805% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -57. 2% for Health Catalyst, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -51. 7% for HCAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INVA leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 45. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 70. 6% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. HCAT, INVA, HIMS, TDOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCAT or INVA or HIMS or PRGO or TDOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). Health Catalyst, Inc. (HCAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, HCAT: -95. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCAT and INVA and HIMS and PRGO and TDOC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while HCAT, INVA, HIMS, TDOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.