Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HCHL
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-60.8%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92T
5Y Perf.+23.6%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.13T
5Y Perf.-15.4%
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.-21.4%

HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HCHL logoHCHL
AMZN logoAMZN
MSFT logoMSFT
PRKS logoPRKS
IndustryRestaurantsSpecialty RetailSoftware - InfrastructureLeisure
Market Cap$14M$2.92T$3.13T$2.02B
Revenue (TTM)$8M$742.78B$318.27B$1.66B
Net Income (TTM)$1M$90.80B$125.22B$168M
Gross Margin27.3%50.6%68.3%92.3%
Operating Margin15.8%11.5%46.8%22.0%
Forward P/E34.8x25.3x10.0x
Total Debt$5M$152.99B$112.18B$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$3M$86.81B$30.24B$100M

HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HCHL
AMZN
MSFT
PRKS
StockJun 25May 26Return
Happy City Holdings… (HCHL)10039.2-60.8%
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)100123.6+23.6%
Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT)10084.6-15.4%
United Parks & Reso… (PRKS)10078.6-21.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HCHL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Microsoft Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. AMZN and PRKS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HCHL
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares
The Growth Play

HCHL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth 100.0%
  • 22.8% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
  • Beta 0.36 vs PRKS's 1.54
  • 24.0% ROA vs PRKS's 6.4%, ROIC 40.6% vs 25.5%
Best for: growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Value Pick

AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.24 vs MSFT's 1.35
  • +43.7% vs HCHL's -59.8%
Best for: valuation efficiency
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
The Income Pick

MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
The Value Play

PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (10.0x vs 25.3x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHCHL logoHCHL22.8% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
ValuePRKS logoPRKSLower P/E (10.0x vs 25.3x)
Quality / MarginsMSFT logoMSFT39.3% margin vs PRKS's 10.1%
Stability / SafetyHCHL logoHCHLBeta 0.36 vs PRKS's 1.54
DividendsMSFT logoMSFT0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMZN logoAMZN+43.7% vs HCHL's -59.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HCHL logoHCHL24.0% ROA vs PRKS's 6.4%, ROIC 40.6% vs 25.5%

HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HCHLHappy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares

Segment breakdown not available.

AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Online Stores
37.6%$269.3B
Third-Party Seller Services
24.0%$172.2B
Amazon Web Services
18.0%$128.7B
Advertising Services
9.6%$68.6B
Subscription Services
6.9%$49.6B
Physical Stores
3.1%$22.6B
Other Services
0.8%$5.9B
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
FY 2025
Server Products And Cloud Services
34.9%$98.4B
Microsoft Three Six Five Commercial Products And Cloud Services
31.2%$87.8B
Gaming
8.3%$23.5B
Linked In Corporation
6.3%$17.8B
Windows
6.1%$17.3B
Search Advertising
4.9%$13.9B
Dynamics Products And Cloud Services
2.8%$7.8B
Other (3)
5.4%$15.2B
PRKSUnited Parks & Resorts Inc.
FY 2024
Admission
54.5%$940M
Food Merchandise And Other Revenue
45.5%$786M

HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSFTLAGGINGPRKS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 89544.1x HCHL's $8M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRKS's 10.1%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHCHL logoHCHLHappy City Holdin…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$742.8B$318.3B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$155.9B$192.6B$540M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$90.8B$125.2B$168M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.5B$72.9B$263M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.3%+50.6%+68.3%+92.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.8%+11.5%+46.8%+22.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.9%+12.2%+39.3%+10.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.9%-0.3%+22.9%+15.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.6%+18.3%-2.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+74.8%+23.4%-44.0%
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 68% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricHCHL logoHCHLHappy City Holdin…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Market CapShares × price$14M$2.92T$3.13T$2.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16M$2.98T$3.21T$1.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS37.82x30.86x12.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.77x25.34x9.99x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.35x1.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.13x20.47x19.72x3.56x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.75x4.07x11.10x1.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.14x9.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.39x378.98x43.66x7.68x
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HCHL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HCHL delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. MSFT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCHL's 8.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCHL scores 7/9 vs PRKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHCHL logoHCHLHappy City Holdin…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.2%+23.3%+33.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+24.0%+11.5%+19.2%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+40.6%+14.7%+24.9%+25.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+62.3%+15.3%+29.7%+15.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage8.19x0.37x0.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M$66.2B$81.9B-$100M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$86.8B$30.2B$100M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$153.0B$112.2B$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.20x39.96x55.65x2.69x
HCHL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,246 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,020 for HCHL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs HCHL's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs HCHL's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHCHL logoHCHLHappy City Holdin…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-49.8%+19.7%-10.8%+2.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-59.8%+43.7%-2.1%-18.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.8%+156.2%+39.5%-34.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.8%+64.8%+72.5%-31.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.8%+697.8%+787.7%+103.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-26.2%+36.8%+11.7%-13.1%
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HCHL and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HCHL is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRKS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs HCHL's 27.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHCHL logoHCHLHappy City Holdin…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.36x1.51x0.89x1.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.25$278.56$555.45$56.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.80$185.01$356.28$28.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.7%+97.3%+75.8%+65.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.081.154.054.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded82K45.5M32.5M944K
Evenly matched — HCHL and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AMZN as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHCHL logoHCHLHappy City Holdin…AMZN logoAMZNAmazon.com, Inc.MSFT logoMSFTMicrosoft Corpora…PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$306.77$551.75$47.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts948123
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises190
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.23
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.6%+0.8%
MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). PRKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMicrosoft Corporation (MSFT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HCHL vs AMZN vs MSFT vs PRKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger pick with 22.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS?

On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS?

Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.

5%, compared to -59. 8% for Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus HCHL's -59. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

36β versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning PRKS is approximately 321% more volatile than HCHL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 8% for Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is pulling ahead at 22.

8% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for United Parks & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS?

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus 10. 1% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 31. 1% to $551. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS?

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. HCHL, AMZN, PRKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HCHL or AMZN or MSFT or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, PRKS: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HCHL and AMZN and MSFT and PRKS?

These companies operate in different sectors (HCHL (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and MSFT (Technology) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HCHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. MSFT pays a dividend while HCHL, AMZN, PRKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HCHL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMZN

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSFT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRKS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HCHL and AMZN and MSFT and PRKS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HCHL: 22.8% · AMZN: 16.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(HCHL: 15.9% · AMZN: 12.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.