Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HCHL vs CNK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
HCHL vs CNK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $14M | $3.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $138M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 40.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $344M |
HCHL vs CNK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Happy City Holdings… (HCHL) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCHL vs CNK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCHL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, current ratio 0.77x
- 22.8% revenue growth vs CNK's 2.1%
CNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.1%
- -6.6% 10Y total return vs HCHL's -59.8%
- Beta 0.22, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.8% revenue growth vs CNK's 2.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs CNK's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs HCHL's 0.36 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.7% vs HCHL's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.0% ROA vs CNK's 3.0%, ROIC 40.6% vs 7.5% |
HCHL vs CNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCHL vs CNK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCHL leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 375.5x HCHL's $8M. HCHL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNK's 4.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $545M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $138M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $177M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +40.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +4.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CNK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HCHL's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNK's 12.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 26.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 12.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.39x | 18.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $25 for CNK. HCHL carries lower financial leverage with a 8.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCHL scores 7/9 vs CNK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +25.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.0% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.6% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +62.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.19x | 9.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.20x | 1.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNK five years ago would be worth $12,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,020 for HCHL. Over the past 12 months, CNK leads with a -10.7% total return vs HCHL's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNK at 19.6% vs HCHL's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.8% | +17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.8% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | +71.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | +29.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -6.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
CNK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCHL's 0.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNK currently trades 80.8% from its 52-week high vs HCHL's 27.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.25 | $34.01 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $21.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.7% | +80.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CNK is the only dividend payer here at 1.05% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.6% |
CNK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HCHL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
HCHL vs CNK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCHL or CNK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger pick with 22.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HCHL or CNK?
Over the past 5 years, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) delivered a total return of +29. 3%, compared to -59. 8% for Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNK returned -6. 6% versus HCHL's -59. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HCHL or CNK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares's 0. 36β — meaning HCHL is approximately 68% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HCHL or CNK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is pulling ahead at 22.
8% versus 2. 1% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -49. 5% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HCHL or CNK?
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 4. 4% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCHL leads at 15. 8% versus 11. 0% for CNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCHL leads at 27. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HCHL or CNK?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. HCHL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is HCHL or CNK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, HCHL: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HCHL and CNK?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCHL (Consumer Cyclical) and CNK (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNK pays a dividend while HCHL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.