Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $14M | $3.21B | $1.92B | $192.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $3.12B | $405M | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $138M | $43M | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 40.7% | 58.1% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 11.0% | 21.4% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.0x | 21.1x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $3.78B | $297M | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $344M | $151M | $5.70B |
HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Happy City Holdings… (HCHL) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK) | 100 | 91.1 | -8.9% |
| IMAX Corporation (IMAX) | 100 | 127.4 | +27.4% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 87.7 | -12.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCHL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, current ratio 0.77x
- 22.8% revenue growth vs CNK's 2.1%
- 15.9% margin vs CNK's 4.4%
CNK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.22, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.71x
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 16.5x)
- Beta 0.22 vs DIS's 0.90
IMAX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.9% 10Y total return vs DIS's 11.8%
- +38.9% vs HCHL's -59.8%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.8% revenue growth vs CNK's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs CNK's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs DIS's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs HCHL's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.0% ROA vs CNK's 3.0%, ROIC 40.6% vs 7.5% |
HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCHL leads 1 • CNK leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 11725.4x HCHL's $8M. HCHL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNK's 4.4%. On growth, DIS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $3.1B | $405M | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $545M | $150M | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $138M | $43M | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $177M | $115M | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +40.7% | +58.1% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +11.0% | +21.4% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +4.4% | +10.7% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +5.7% | +28.5% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -4.7% | -6.1% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% | +65.5% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNK and DIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, DIS trades at a 72% valuation discount to IMAX's 56.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HCHL's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IMAX's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $3.2B | $1.9B | $192.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $6.6B | $2.1B | $231.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 26.42x | 56.56x | 15.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.97x | 21.15x | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 12.23x | 13.10x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.03x | 4.69x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 8.92x | 4.63x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.39x | 18.11x | 16.18x | 19.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $10 for DIS. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs CNK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +25.4% | +10.8% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.0% | +3.0% | +4.9% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.6% | +7.5% | +12.7% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +62.3% | +9.3% | +14.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.19x | 9.14x | 0.70x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $3.4B | $146M | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $344M | $151M | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $3.8B | $297M | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.20x | 1.89x | 21.15x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMAX five years ago would be worth $17,034 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,020 for HCHL. Over the past 12 months, IMAX leads with a +38.9% total return vs HCHL's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMAX at 21.5% vs HCHL's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.8% | +17.2% | -1.1% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.8% | -10.7% | +38.9% | +7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | +71.0% | +79.5% | +8.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | +29.3% | +70.3% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -6.6% | +8.9% | +11.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | +19.6% | +21.5% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNK and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DIS's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs HCHL's 27.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.22x | 0.43x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.25 | $34.01 | $43.16 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $21.60 | $24.20 | $92.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.7% | +80.8% | +82.6% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 43.7 | 42.4 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 2.1M | 1.1M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CNK and IMAX and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNK as "Buy", IMAX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 15.2% for CNK (target: $32). For income investors, CNK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.05% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $31.67 | $43.00 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 | 25 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.29 | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.6% | +0.1% | +1.8% |
IMAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HCHL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HCHL vs CNK vs IMAX vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger pick with 22.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). The Walt Disney Company (DIS) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (16. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS?
On trailing P/E, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is the cheapest at 15.
9x versus IMAX Corporation at 56. 6x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) delivered a total return of +70.
3%, compared to -59. 8% for Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DIS returned +11. 8% versus HCHL's -59. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus The Walt Disney Company's 0. 90β — meaning DIS is approximately 313% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is pulling ahead at 22.
8% versus 2. 1% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -49. 5% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMAX leads at 10. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS?
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 4. 4% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMAX leads at 23. 3% versus 11. 0% for CNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMAX leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 1x for IMAX Corporation — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 28. 3% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS?
In this comparison, CNK (1.
1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. HCHL, IMAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCHL or CNK or IMAX or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, IMAX: +8. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCHL and CNK and IMAX and DIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCHL (Consumer Cyclical) and CNK (Communication Services) and IMAX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CNK, DIS pay a dividend while HCHL, IMAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 24%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.