Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Apparel - Manufacturers
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Leisure | Leisure | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $14M | $188M | $2.02B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $121M | $1.66B | $2.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-13M | $168M | $67M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 71.0% | 92.3% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | -6.3% | 22.0% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x | 10.0x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $24M | $0.00 | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $38M | $100M | $407M |
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Happy City Holdings… (HCHL) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 103.1 | +3.1% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 78.6 | -21.4% |
| G-III Apparel Group… (GIII) | 100 | 139.7 | +39.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HCHL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, current ratio 0.77x
- Beta 0.36, current ratio 0.77x
- 22.8% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0%
PLBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +54.6% vs HCHL's -59.8%
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.54
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs GIII's -27.0%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.8x)
GIII lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.8% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs PLBY's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs PLBY's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.6% vs HCHL's -59.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.0% ROA vs PLBY's -4.6%, ROIC 40.6% vs -2.9% |
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCHL leads 1 • GIII leads 1 • PLBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIII is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 356.5x HCHL's $8M. HCHL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLBY's -10.5%. On growth, PRKS holds the edge at -2.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $121M | $1.7B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $684,000 | $540M | $186M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$13M | $168M | $67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$1M | $263M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +71.0% | +92.3% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -6.3% | +22.0% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | -10.5% | +10.1% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -0.8% | +15.8% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -58.1% | -2.8% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +120.8% | -44.0% | -169.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 42% valuation discount to GIII's 20.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 34.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $188M | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $174M | $1.9B | $926M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -12.85x | 12.11x | 20.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.78x | 9.99x | 10.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.13x | 34.02x | 3.56x | 4.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 1.56x | 1.22x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 9.22x | — | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.39x | — | 7.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCHL delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PLBY. GIII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HCHL's 8.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCHL scores 7/9 vs GIII's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | -2.5% | — | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.0% | -4.6% | +6.4% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +40.6% | -2.9% | +25.5% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +62.3% | -1.4% | +15.8% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.19x | 1.30x | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$14M | -$100M | -$395M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $38M | $100M | $407M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $24M | $0 | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.20x | -0.39x | 2.69x | 275.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GIII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIII five years ago would be worth $9,133 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $339 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, PLBY leads with a +54.6% total return vs HCHL's -59.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIII at 24.8% vs HCHL's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.8% | -9.2% | +2.3% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.8% | +54.6% | -18.7% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -8.7% | -34.3% | +94.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -96.6% | -31.0% | -8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | -83.1% | +103.5% | -27.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | -3.0% | -13.1% | +24.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HCHL and GIII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCHL is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLBY's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIII currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs HCHL's 27.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 1.96x | 1.54x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.25 | $2.75 | $56.95 | $34.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $1.06 | $28.77 | $20.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.7% | +60.7% | +65.1% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 45.9 | 54.8 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 82K | 775K | 944K | 522K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBY as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy", GIII as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 656.3% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs 7.8% for GIII (target: $34).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.63 | $47.60 | $33.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 23 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
PRKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HCHL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
HCHL vs PLBY vs PRKS vs GIII: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger pick with 22.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII?
Over the past 5 years, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) delivered a total return of -8. 7%, compared to -96. 6% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus PLBY's -83. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Playboy, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning PLBY is approximately 438% more volatile than HCHL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 8% for Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is pulling ahead at 22.
8% versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -64. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRKS leads at -1. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII?
Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -10. 5% for Playboy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus -2. 7% for PLBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Playboy, Inc. — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 656. 3% to $12. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HCHL or PLBY or PRKS or GIII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Happy City Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary shares (HCHL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36)). Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCHL: -59. 8%, PLBY: -83. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCHL and PLBY and PRKS and GIII?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HCHL is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GIII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.