HCKT vs FORR vs IT vs HURN

For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). Gartner, Inc. (IT) offers the better valuation at 16. 4x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Gartner, Inc.

(IT) is the cheapest at 16. 4x versus The Hackett Group, Inc. at 24. 3x. On forward P/E, The Hackett Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Hackett Group, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Gartner, Inc. 's 0. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -85. 9% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HURN returned +116. 8% versus FORR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Forrester Research, Inc.

(FORR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus The Hackett Group, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HCKT is approximately 60% more volatile than FORR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 57% versus 11% for Gartner, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Huron Consulting Group Inc. grew EPS -6. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1993. 3% for Forrester Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Gartner, Inc.

(IT) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 2% net margin versus -30. 1% for Forrester Research, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IT leads at 15. 8% versus 0. 5% for FORR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IT leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Gartner, Inc. 's 0. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCKT: 79. 7% to $20. 50.

In this comparison, HCKT (4.

1% yield) pays a dividend. FORR, IT, HURN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Hackett Group, Inc.

(HCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCKT: +0. 9%, IT: +64. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (HCKT (Technology) and FORR (Industrials) and IT (Technology) and HURN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HCKT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FORR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HCKT pays a dividend while FORR, IT, HURN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.