Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HCSG
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.60B
5Y Perf.+78.8%
SERV
Serve Robotics Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$560M
5Y Perf.+76.5%
CART
Instacart (Maplebear Inc.)

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.99B
5Y Perf.+1.9%
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$569M
5Y Perf.-39.6%
DASH
DoorDash, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$74.67B
5Y Perf.+24.4%

HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HCSG logoHCSG
SERV logoSERV
CART logoCART
AMSF logoAMSF
DASH logoDASH
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesIndustrial - MachinerySpecialty RetailInsurance - SpecialtyInternet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.60B$560M$8.99B$569M$74.67B
Revenue (TTM)$1.84B$5M$3.86B$325M$14.72B
Net Income (TTM)$59M$-137M$485M$46M$925M
Gross Margin13.3%-441.1%73.0%47.6%50.9%
Operating Margin3.0%-28.8%15.9%17.8%4.9%
Forward P/E20.8x15.8x14.4x67.3x
Total Debt$25M$5M$36M$491K$3.75B
Cash & Equiv.$161M$106M$637M$62M$4.38B

HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HCSG
SERV
CART
AMSF
DASH
StockMar 24May 26Return
Healthcare Services… (HCSG)100178.8+78.8%
Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV)100176.5+76.5%
Instacart (Maplebea… (CART)100101.9+1.9%
AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF)10060.4-39.6%
DoorDash, Inc. (DASH)100124.4+24.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMSF leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Healthcare Services Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. SERV and CART also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HCSG
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

HCSG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 1.12
  • +55.8% vs AMSF's -29.2%
Best for: income & stability
SERV
Serve Robotics Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

SERV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 70.9% 10Y total return vs AMSF's 31.8%
  • 46.3% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
CART
Instacart (Maplebear Inc.)
The Defensive Pick

CART is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.40x
  • 12.0% ROA vs SERV's -44.9%, ROIC 24.0% vs -64.9%
Best for: defensive
AMSF
AMERISAFE, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

AMSF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.32x
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 67.3x)
  • 14.3% margin vs SERV's -26.4%
  • Beta 0.23 vs SERV's 4.09, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
DASH
DoorDash, Inc.
The Growth Play

DASH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSERV logoSERV46.3% revenue growth vs AMSF's 2.6%
ValueAMSF logoAMSFLower P/E (14.4x vs 67.3x)
Quality / MarginsAMSF logoAMSF14.3% margin vs SERV's -26.4%
Stability / SafetyAMSF logoAMSFBeta 0.23 vs SERV's 4.09, lower leverage
DividendsAMSF logoAMSF8.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HCSG logoHCSG+55.8% vs AMSF's -29.2%
Efficiency (ROA)CART logoCART12.0% ROA vs SERV's -44.9%, ROIC 24.0% vs -64.9%

HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HCSGHealthcare Services Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Dietary Services
55.1%$1.0B
Environmental Services
44.9%$825M
SERVServe Robotics Inc.
FY 2025
Fleet Services
61.2%$2M
Software Services
38.8%$1M
CARTInstacart (Maplebear Inc.)
FY 2025
Transaction
71.5%$2.7B
Advertising And Other
28.5%$1.1B
AMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DASHDoorDash, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$13.7B

HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHCSGLAGGINGDASH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CART and AMSF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

DASH is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.7B annually — 2833.9x SERV's $5M. AMSF is the more profitable business, keeping 14.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SERV's -26.4%.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…SERV logoSERVServe Robotics In…CART logoCARTInstacart (Mapleb…AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.DASH logoDASHDoorDash, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.8B$5M$3.9B$325M$14.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$72M-$142M$721M$58M$1.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$59M-$137M$485M$46M$925M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$139M-$148M$883M$8M$1.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.3%-4.4%+73.0%+47.6%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.0%-28.8%+15.9%+17.8%+4.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.2%-26.4%+12.6%+14.3%+6.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.6%-28.5%+22.9%+2.5%+11.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.6%+5.8%+13.6%+10.3%+33.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+175.0%-80.6%+50.0%-8.5%-4.5%
Evenly matched — CART and AMSF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SERV and AMSF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.3x trailing earnings, AMSF trades at a 85% valuation discount to DASH's 80.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMSF's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DASH's 50.4x.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…SERV logoSERVServe Robotics In…CART logoCARTInstacart (Mapleb…AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.DASH logoDASHDoorDash, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$560M$9.0B$569M$74.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$459M$8.4B$508M$74.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.54x-5.58x23.74x12.27x80.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.83x15.82x14.42x67.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.38x12.43x8.53x50.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x211.40x2.40x1.80x5.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.19x1.61x4.22x2.30x7.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.49x9.87x63.83x34.34x
Evenly matched — SERV and AMSF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CART leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CART delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-47 for SERV. AMSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DASH's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCSG scores 7/9 vs SERV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…SERV logoSERVServe Robotics In…CART logoCARTInstacart (Mapleb…AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.DASH logoDASHDoorDash, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.8%-47.3%+16.3%+9.7%+9.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.3%-44.9%+12.0%+5.6%+5.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%-64.9%+24.0%+21.9%+7.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.7%-46.3%+18.9%+16.8%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973675
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.01x0.01x0.00x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$136M-$101M-$601M-$61M-$627M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$161M$106M$637M$62M$4.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$25M$5M$36M$491,000$3.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense33.02x-14706.75x
CART leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HCSG and SERV and DASH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SERV five years ago would be worth $17,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,888 for HCSG. Over the past 12 months, HCSG leads with a +55.8% total return vs AMSF's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DASH at 36.9% vs AMSF's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…SERV logoSERVServe Robotics In…CART logoCARTInstacart (Mapleb…AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.DASH logoDASHDoorDash, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.6%-23.2%-13.5%-18.3%-22.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+55.8%+51.8%-16.9%-29.2%-3.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+48.6%+70.9%+12.7%-24.8%+156.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-21.1%+70.9%+12.7%-18.9%+37.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-26.8%+70.9%+12.7%+31.8%-9.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+14.1%+19.6%+4.1%-9.1%+36.9%
Evenly matched — HCSG and SERV and DASH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HCSG and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMSF is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SERV's 4.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HCSG currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs SERV's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…SERV logoSERVServe Robotics In…CART logoCARTInstacart (Mapleb…AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.DASH logoDASHDoorDash, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x4.09x0.39x0.23x1.44x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.39$18.64$53.50$48.54$285.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$12.66$5.87$32.73$29.42$143.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.5%+48.8%+71.0%+62.4%+60.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10061.853.645.934.247.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded676K3.7M3.9M212K4.1M
Evenly matched — HCSG and AMSF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HCSG as "Hold", SERV as "Buy", CART as "Buy", AMSF as "Buy", DASH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.6% upside for SERV (target: $16) vs 9.8% for HCSG (target: $25). AMSF is the only dividend payer here at 8.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricHCSG logoHCSGHealthcare Servic…SERV logoSERVServe Robotics In…CART logoCARTInstacart (Mapleb…AMSF logoAMSFAMERISAFE, Inc.DASH logoDASHDoorDash, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.50$16.33$49.70$44.50$253.35
# AnalystsCovering analysts152026638
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises200
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%0.0%+15.4%+2.1%0.0%
HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CART leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). HCSG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.

Best OverallHealthcare Services Group, … (HCSG)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HCSG vs SERV vs CART vs AMSF vs DASH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Serve Robotics Inc.

(SERV) is the stronger pick with 46. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH?

On trailing P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the cheapest at 12. 3x versus DoorDash, Inc. at 80. 4x. On forward P/E, AMERISAFE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH?

Over the past 5 years, Serve Robotics Inc.

(SERV) delivered a total return of +70. 9%, compared to -21. 1% for Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SERV returned +70. 9% versus HCSG's -26. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Serve Robotics Inc. 's 4. 09β — meaning SERV is approximately 1672% more volatile than AMSF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 37% for DoorDash, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Serve Robotics Inc.

(SERV) is pulling ahead at 46. 3% versus 2. 6% for AMERISAFE, Inc. (AMSF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DoorDash, Inc. grew EPS 634. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 3% for Serve Robotics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SERV leads at 190. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH?

AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 9% net margin versus -38. 2% for Serve Robotics Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMSF leads at 18. 6% versus -42. 5% for SERV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CART leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 67. 3x for DoorDash, Inc. — 52. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SERV: 79. 6% to $16. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH?

In this comparison, AMSF (8.

4% yield) pays a dividend. HCSG, SERV, CART, DASH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HCSG or SERV or CART or AMSF or DASH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AMERISAFE, Inc.

(AMSF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 8. 4% yield). Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) carries a higher beta of 4. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMSF: +31. 8%, SERV: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HCSG and SERV and CART and AMSF and DASH?

These companies operate in different sectors (HCSG (Healthcare) and SERV (Industrials) and CART (Consumer Cyclical) and AMSF (Financial Services) and DASH (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HCSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SERV is a small-cap high-growth stock; CART is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMSF is a small-cap deep-value stock; DASH is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AMSF pays a dividend while HCSG, SERV, CART, DASH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HCSG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SERV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 288%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CART

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMSF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DASH

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HCSG and SERV and CART and AMSF and DASH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HCSG: 6.6% · SERV: 577.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.