Specialty Retail
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $888M | $80.59B | $2.57T | $263.29B | $140.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $79.46B | $31.80B | $742.78B | $1.02T | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5.53B | $1.92B | $90.80B | $103.59B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 43.9% | 50.6% | 39.8% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 9.6% | 11.5% | 5.8% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.2x | 27.1x | 2.6x | 59.7x |
| Total Debt | $3.20B | $11.39B | $152.99B | $259.02B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.51B | $3.67B | $86.81B | $172.92B | $1.53B |
HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-Market Elektronik… (HEPS) | 100 | 21.3 | -78.7% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 101.3 | +1.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 143.4 | +43.4% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 57.8 | -42.2% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 72.2 | -27.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HEPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7%
- Beta 0.90 vs SHOP's 2.29
MELI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 1.17x
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.97 vs SHOP's 2.04
- Lower P/E (27.1x vs 59.7x), PEG 0.97 vs 2.04
- 12.2% margin vs HEPS's -7.0%
- +11.9% vs MELI's -32.9%
BABA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.29, Low D/E 23.1%, current ratio 1.28x
- 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 37.7% 10Y total return vs MELI's 10.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.0% revenue growth vs BABA's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.1x vs 59.7x), PEG 0.97 vs 2.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs HEPS's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs SHOP's 2.29 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.9% vs MELI's -32.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs HEPS's -17.7% |
HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories
HEPS leads 1 • MELI leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.02T annually — 82.8x SHOP's $12.4B. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HEPS's -7.0%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +49.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $79.5B | $31.8B | $742.8B | $1.02T | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $3.9B | $155.9B | $64.7B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5.5B | $1.9B | $90.8B | $103.6B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.1B | $10.7B | -$2.5B | -$50.5B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +43.9% | +50.6% | +39.8% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +9.6% | +11.5% | +5.8% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +6.0% | +12.2% | +10.1% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +33.7% | -0.3% | -4.9% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.0% | +49.0% | +16.6% | +2.9% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | -15.5% | +74.8% | +100.0% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, BABA trades at a 85% valuation discount to SHOP's 115.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.19x vs SHOP's 3.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $888M | $80.6B | $2.57T | $263.3B | $140.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $709M | $88.3B | $2.63T | $276.0B | $139.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.70x | 40.36x | 33.27x | 17.34x | 115.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.22x | 27.13x | 2.57x | 59.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | — | 3.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.47x | 23.41x | 18.06x | 17.48x | 92.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.45x | 2.79x | 3.58x | 1.74x | 12.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 20.40x | 11.94x | 6.28x | 1.63x | 10.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.79x | 7.48x | 333.39x | — | 69.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN and SHOP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HEPS. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs BABA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +29.6% | +23.3% | +9.3% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.7% | +4.8% | +11.5% | +5.5% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +20.8% | +14.7% | +3.8% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -54.3% | +28.3% | +15.3% | +4.3% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 1.69x | 0.37x | 0.23x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8.3B | $7.7B | $66.2B | $86.1B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.5B | $3.7B | $86.8B | $172.9B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $11.4B | $153.0B | $259.0B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.33x | 14.14x | 39.96x | 14.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HEPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $14,100 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,085 for HEPS. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +11.9% total return vs MELI's -32.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HEPS at 32.6% vs MELI's 8.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.4% | -19.5% | +5.3% | -26.9% | -31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.1% | -32.9% | +11.9% | -0.6% | -0.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.3% | +28.4% | +88.5% | +38.0% | +66.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | +11.0% | +41.0% | -44.6% | -17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.2% | +1092.7% | +567.1% | +57.1% | +3767.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.6% | +8.7% | +23.5% | +11.3% | +18.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HEPS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HEPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs BABA's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.22x | 1.43x | 1.29x | 2.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.33 | $2645.22 | $278.56 | $192.67 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.15 | $1495.00 | $197.28 | $103.71 | $94.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +60.1% | +85.6% | +58.6% | +59.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 43.3 | 36.8 | 29.4 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 538K | 42.9M | 10.2M | 9.5M |
Analyst Outlook
BABA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HEPS as "Hold", MELI as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.7% upside for BABA (target: $189) vs 29.0% for AMZN (target: $308). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2166.67 | $307.77 | $189.17 | $156.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 33 | 94 | 59 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $14.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). HEPS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HEPS vs MELI vs AMZN vs BABA vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the stronger pick with 61. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the cheapest at 17.
3x versus Shopify Inc. at 115. 1x. On forward P/E, Alibaba Group Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +41. 0%, compared to -79. 2% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. (HEPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +37. 7% versus HEPS's -79. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning SHOP is approximately 153% more volatile than HEPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.
S. (HEPS) is pulling ahead at 61. 0% versus 2. 7% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -286. 4% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -6. 7% for D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A. S. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHOP leads at 12. 7% versus -2. 4% for HEPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 59. 7x for Shopify Inc. — 57. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BABA: 67. 7% to $189. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP?
In this comparison, BABA (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. HEPS, MELI, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HEPS or MELI or AMZN or BABA or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +1093% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1093%, SHOP: +37. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HEPS and MELI and AMZN and BABA and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (HEPS (Consumer Cyclical) and MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HEPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BABA pays a dividend while HEPS, MELI, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.