Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $60M | $2.35B | $203M | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 63.9% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.6x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home Federal Bancor… (HFBL) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HFBL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 7.2%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.19 vs NBTB's 0.89, lower leverage
NBTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.53 vs HFBL's 4.68
- NIM 3.1% vs TRST's 2.6%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs HFBL's 109.8%
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
TRST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.53 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs NBTB's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HFBL's 0.5% |
HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • HFBL leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 26.8x HFBL's $32M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HFBL's 12.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $241M | $9M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | $225M | $11M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.9% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.6% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 13% valuation discount to HFBL's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs HFBL's 4.68x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $2.4B | $203M | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $2.5B | $136M | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.56x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.80x | 11.78x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.68x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.98x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.11x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HFBL and NBTB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. HFBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRST's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HFBL scores 8/9 vs CZWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $142M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $185M | $119M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs HFBL's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | +9.3% | +21.5% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.8% | +9.0% | +45.6% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.2% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.6% | +29.9% | +71.2% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.5% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HFBL and TRST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HFBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.32 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.0% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 236K | 40K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.53 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +4.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HFBL vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus TRST's +97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 365% more volatile than HFBL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana (HFBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 28% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrustCo Bank Corp NY grew EPS 26. 5% year-over-year, compared to 7. 7% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 12. 0% for Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is HFBL or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc.
of Louisiana (HFBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 2. 7% yield, +109. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HFBL: +109. 8%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HFBL and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.