HFWA vs NWBI vs FIS vs JKHY

For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the cheapest at 14.

0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) delivered a total return of +26. 6%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HFWA returned +109. 7% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Heritage Financial Corporation's 0. 97β — meaning HFWA is approximately 244% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 29% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Financial Corporation grew EPS 58. 1% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JKHY leads at 23. 9% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HFWA leads at 72. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 1. 5% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, HFWA: +109. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (HFWA (Financial Services) and NWBI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HFWA is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.