Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HGBL
Heritage Global Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-9.2%
GBX
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.

Railroads

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.+138.2%
TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc.

Railroads

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.93B
5Y Perf.+83.4%
CPSS
Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$223M
5Y Perf.+297.3%
GNSS
Genasys Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$90M
5Y Perf.-55.0%

HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HGBL logoHGBL
GBX logoGBX
TRN logoTRN
CPSS logoCPSS
GNSS logoGNSS
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsRailroadsRailroadsFinancial - Credit ServicesHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$46M$1.56B$2.93B$223M$90M
Revenue (TTM)$51M$3.06B$2.06B$428M$51M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$185M$255M$19M$-15M
Gross Margin84.4%17.3%27.0%99.6%43.2%
Operating Margin11.0%9.4%16.6%60.8%-22.1%
Forward P/E13.3x16.0x15.8x4.2x
Total Debt$6M$1.84B$5.44B$3.51B$21M
Cash & Equiv.$21M$326M$201M$6M$8M

HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HGBL
GBX
TRN
CPSS
GNSS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL)10090.8-9.2%
The Greenbrier Comp… (GBX)100238.2+138.2%
Trinity Industries,… (TRN)100183.4+83.4%
Consumer Portfolio … (CPSS)100397.3+297.3%
Genasys Inc. (GNSS)10045.0-55.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TRN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Heritage Global Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. GBX, CPSS, and GNSS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
HGBL
Heritage Global Inc.
The Banking Pick

HGBL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 2.16x
  • Beta 0.66, current ratio 2.16x
  • Beta 0.66 vs TRN's 0.97, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
GBX
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
The Niche Pick

GBX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.

  • 4.3% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 7.6% vs -56.7%
Best for: efficiency
TRN
Trinity Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

TRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 3.2%
  • 261.3% 10Y total return vs HGBL's 6.4%
  • 12.4% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
  • 3.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs GBX's 2.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
CPSS
Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CPSS is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 4.9% vs HGBL's 0.2%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: bank quality
GNSS
Genasys Inc.
The Growth Play

GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
  • 69.8% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGNSS logoGNSS69.8% revenue growth vs TRN's -30.0%
ValueCPSS logoCPSSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsTRN logoTRN12.4% margin vs GNSS's -29.2%
Stability / SafetyHGBL logoHGBLBeta 0.66 vs TRN's 0.97, lower leverage
DividendsTRN logoTRN3.2% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs GBX's 2.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TRN logoTRN+57.0% vs HGBL's -32.8%
Efficiency (ROA)GBX logoGBX4.3% ROA vs GNSS's -22.0%, ROIC 7.6% vs -56.7%

HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HGBLHeritage Global Inc.
FY 2025
Service
65.3%$33M
Product
34.7%$18M
GBXThe Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Manufacturing
100.0%$3.1B
TRNTrinity Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Manufacturing
100.0%$952M
CPSSConsumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNSSGenasys Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$181,000

HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHGBLLAGGINGGNSS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CPSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GBX is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 60.2x GNSS's $51M. TRN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GNSS's -29.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHGBL logoHGBLHeritage Global I…GBX logoGBXThe Greenbrier Co…TRN logoTRNTrinity Industrie…CPSS logoCPSSConsumer Portfoli…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$51M$3.1B$2.1B$428M$51M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$413M$646M$88M-$9M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$185M$255M$19M-$15M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$123M-$283M$288M-$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+84.4%+17.3%+27.0%+99.6%+43.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.0%+9.4%+16.6%+60.8%-22.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.0%+6.0%+12.4%+4.5%-29.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.6%+4.0%-13.7%+67.5%-5.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-19.3%-16.0%+145.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.7%+15.4%0.0%+78.0%
CPSS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HGBL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 7.9x trailing earnings, GBX trades at a 40% valuation discount to HGBL's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HGBL's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CPSS's 14.3x.

MetricHGBL logoHGBLHeritage Global I…GBX logoGBXThe Greenbrier Co…TRN logoTRNTrinity Industrie…CPSS logoCPSSConsumer Portfoli…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.
Market CapShares × price$46M$1.6B$2.9B$223M$90M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$31M$3.1B$8.2B$3.7B$104M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.30x7.94x12.01x12.84x-5.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.05x15.75x4.15x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.65x6.69x12.31x14.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.91x0.48x1.36x0.52x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x0.93x2.65x0.80x41.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.77x
HGBL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HGBL and GBX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TRN delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. HGBL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPSS's 11.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GBX scores 8/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHGBL logoHGBLHeritage Global I…GBX logoGBXThe Greenbrier Co…TRN logoTRNTrinity Industrie…CPSS logoCPSSConsumer Portfoli…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.4%+10.7%+21.3%+6.3%-8.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.1%+4.3%+3.0%+0.5%-22.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.0%+7.6%+4.1%+5.4%-56.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.0%+9.1%+4.7%+7.1%-68.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968863
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.09x1.06x4.75x11.33x9.85x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$15M$1.5B$5.2B$3.5B$13M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$21M$326M$201M$6M$8M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$1.8B$5.4B$3.5B$21M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense41.70x3.87x1.29x0.38x-31.66x
Evenly matched — HGBL and GBX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — GBX and TRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CPSS five years ago would be worth $23,884 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,328 for GNSS. Over the past 12 months, TRN leads with a +57.0% total return vs HGBL's -32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GBX at 26.6% vs HGBL's -22.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHGBL logoHGBLHeritage Global I…GBX logoGBXThe Greenbrier Co…TRN logoTRNTrinity Industrie…CPSS logoCPSSConsumer Portfoli…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.1%+8.0%+38.3%+12.0%-8.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-32.8%+20.6%+57.0%+12.6%+2.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-53.5%+102.8%+88.1%-0.5%-31.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-57.4%+14.7%+40.2%+138.8%-66.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+639.3%+130.7%+261.3%+176.1%+14.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-22.5%+26.6%+23.4%-0.2%-11.8%
Evenly matched — GBX and TRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TRN and CPSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HGBL is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRN's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRN currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs HGBL's 57.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHGBL logoHGBLHeritage Global I…GBX logoGBXThe Greenbrier Co…TRN logoTRNTrinity Industrie…CPSS logoCPSSConsumer Portfoli…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x0.95x0.97x0.62x0.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.32$59.19$37.27$10.46$2.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$38.23$22.38$6.67$1.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+57.3%+85.2%+98.3%+98.2%+74.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.050.564.180.459.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded66K405K575K22K95K
Evenly matched — TRN and CPSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GBX as "Buy", TRN as "Hold", CPSS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.8% upside for GBX (target: $49) vs -4.5% for TRN (target: $35). For income investors, TRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs GBX's 2.44%.

MetricHGBL logoHGBLHeritage Global I…GBX logoGBXThe Greenbrier Co…TRN logoTRNTrinity Industrie…CPSS logoCPSSConsumer Portfoli…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$49.00$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts24254
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises112151
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.23$1.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.7%+1.5%+2.4%+3.9%0.0%
TRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CPSS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HGBL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallHeritage Global Inc. (HGBL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HGBL vs GBX vs TRN vs CPSS vs GNSS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. (GBX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS?

On trailing P/E, The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.

(GBX) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Heritage Global Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS?

Over the past 5 years, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

(CPSS) delivered a total return of +138. 8%, compared to -66. 7% for Genasys Inc. (GNSS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HGBL returned +617. 1% versus GNSS's +18. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

(CPSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Trinity Industries, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning TRN is approximately 56% more volatile than CPSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heritage Global Inc. (HGBL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 11% for Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -30. 0% for Trinity Industries, Inc. (TRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Trinity Industries, Inc. grew EPS 86. 0% year-over-year, compared to -28. 6% for Heritage Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRN leads at 2. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS?

Trinity Industries, Inc.

(TRN) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -44. 4% for Genasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPSS leads at 60. 8% versus -41. 2% for GNSS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPSS leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

(CPSS) trades at 4. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GBX: -2. 8% to $49. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS?

In this comparison, TRN (3.

2% yield), GBX (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HGBL, CPSS, GNSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is HGBL or GBX or TRN or CPSS or GNSS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Heritage Global Inc.

(HGBL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +617. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HGBL: +617. 1%, GNSS: +18. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HGBL and GBX and TRN and CPSS and GNSS?

These companies operate in different sectors (HGBL (Financial Services) and GBX (Industrials) and TRN (Industrials) and CPSS (Financial Services) and GNSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: HGBL is a small-cap deep-value stock; GBX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock. GBX, TRN pay a dividend while HGBL, CPSS, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HGBL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GBX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CPSS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNSS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform HGBL and GBX and TRN and CPSS and GNSS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(HGBL: 12.4% · GBX: -19.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(HGBL: 7.0% · GBX: 6.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(HGBL: 13.3x · GBX: 7.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.