Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HGTY vs NODK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
HGTY vs NODK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $3.45B | $263M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $-12M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 78.0% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 271.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $233M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $299M | $52M |
HGTY vs NODK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HGTY vs NODK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HGTY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 0.2%
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth 270.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
- 3.2% 10Y total return vs NODK's -13.2%
NODK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +5.1% vs HGTY's +3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -12.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.9 vs NODK's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NODK's 0.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs HGTY's +3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.7% ROA vs NODK's -0.9%, ROIC 17.9% vs -4.8% |
HGTY vs NODK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HGTY vs NODK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HGTY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HGTY and NODK operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and -$12M in trailing revenue. HGTY is the more profitable business, keeping 2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's -3.7%. On growth, HGTY holds the edge at -2.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | -$12M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $123M | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | -$27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.0% | +29.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -191.2% | +93.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NODK leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $263M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $213M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.19x | -25.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 271.16x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.17x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 0.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.67x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.76x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HGTY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HGTY delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NODK. NODK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HGTY's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HGTY scores 6/9 vs NODK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | -1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.9% | -4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | -9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | -$50M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $299M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $233M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.01x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HGTY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HGTY five years ago would be worth $10,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,861 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, NODK leads with a +5.1% total return vs HGTY's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HGTY at 2.0% vs NODK's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.5% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | +5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -3.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HGTY and NODK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HGTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NODK currently trades 87.1% from its 52-week high vs HGTY's 71.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $14.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.81 | $12.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 171K | 17K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
HGTY is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% |
HGTY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NODK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HGTY vs NODK: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HGTY or NODK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hagerty, Inc.
(HGTY) is the stronger pick with 22. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (271. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HGTY or NODK?
Over the past 5 years, Hagerty, Inc.
(HGTY) delivered a total return of +3. 2%, compared to -31. 4% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HGTY returned +3. 2% versus NODK's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HGTY or NODK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hagerty, Inc.
(HGTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 53β — meaning NODK is approximately 14% more volatile than HGTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 31% for Hagerty, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HGTY or NODK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hagerty, Inc.
(HGTY) is pulling ahead at 22. 2% versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hagerty, Inc. grew EPS 270. 0% year-over-year, compared to -308. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HGTY leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HGTY or NODK?
Hagerty, Inc.
(HGTY) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -3. 7% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HGTY leads at 9. 6% versus -4. 3% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HGTY or NODK?
In this comparison, HGTY (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NODK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is HGTY or NODK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hagerty, Inc.
(HGTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HGTY: +3. 2%, NODK: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HGTY and NODK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.