Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Property & Casualty
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $3.45B | $263M | $33.42B | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.42B | $-12M | $19.93B | $978M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $-4M | $4.40B | $197M |
| Gross Margin | 78.0% | 29.6% | 37.2% | 60.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | -4.3% | 25.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 271.2x | — | 10.0x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $233M | $1M | $2.73B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $299M | $52M | $993M | $107M |
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 67.4 | -32.6% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 240.9 | +140.9% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 150.2 | +50.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HGTY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 0.2%
- Beta 0.46, yield 0.2%
- 0.2% yield, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NODK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs PLMR's -29.2%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 271.2x)
PLMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 496.9% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 321.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 0.8%
- PEG 0.12 vs ACGL's 0.35
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -12.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 271.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs NODK's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs NODK's 0.53 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs PLMR's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs NODK's -0.9%, ROIC 25.5% vs -4.8% |
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLMR leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACGL leads 1 • HGTY leads 0 • NODK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL and NODK operate at a comparable scale, with $19.9B and -$12M in trailing revenue. ACGL is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's -3.7%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +59.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | -$12M | $19.9B | $978M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $123M | -$4M | $5.2B | $267M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | -$4M | $4.4B | $197M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | -$27M | $6.1B | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.0% | +29.6% | +37.2% | +60.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | -4.3% | +25.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -3.7% | +22.1% | +20.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | -5.4% | +30.7% | +32.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.4% | -16.6% | +7.3% | +59.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -191.2% | +93.5% | +39.0% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NODK and ACGL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ACGL trades at a 70% valuation discount to HGTY's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLMR offers better value at 0.16x vs ACGL's 0.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $263M | $33.4B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $213M | $35.2B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.19x | -25.62x | 8.07x | 15.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 271.16x | — | 10.04x | 11.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.28x | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.17x | — | 6.80x | 11.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 0.92x | 1.68x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.67x | 1.12x | 1.46x | 3.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.76x | — | 5.45x | 7.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLMR delivers a 21.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NODK. NODK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HGTY's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACGL scores 7/9 vs NODK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.6% | -1.8% | +19.0% | +21.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -0.9% | +5.9% | +6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.9% | -4.8% | +15.4% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | -9.5% | +11.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.01x | 0.11x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | -$50M | $1.7B | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $299M | $52M | $993M | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $233M | $1M | $2.7B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.01x | — | 34.86x | 74.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,750 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,861 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, NODK leads with a +5.1% total return vs PLMR's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLMR at 30.8% vs NODK's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.5% | -3.5% | -0.1% | -14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | +5.1% | -0.8% | -29.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.2% | -3.5% | +29.8% | +123.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -31.4% | +147.5% | +71.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | -13.2% | +321.0% | +496.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.0% | -1.2% | +9.1% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs PLMR's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.53x | -0.01x | 0.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $14.70 | $103.39 | $175.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.81 | $12.01 | $82.45 | $107.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.9% | +87.1% | +90.7% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 48.2 | 45.7 | 34.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 171K | 17K | 1.9M | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HGTY and PLMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HGTY as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.4% upside for HGTY (target: $14) vs -2.7% for PLMR (target: $110). HGTY is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.33 | — | $104.00 | $110.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 34 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | — | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +5.7% | +1.2% |
PLMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACGL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
HGTY vs NODK vs ACGL vs PLMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR?
On trailing P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Hagerty, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Arch Capital Group Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Palomar Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +147. 5%, compared to -31. 4% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +496. 9% versus NODK's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 53β — meaning NODK is approximately -4669% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 31% for Hagerty, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hagerty, Inc. grew EPS 270. 0% year-over-year, compared to -308. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR?
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus -3. 7% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLMR leads at 28. 9% versus -4. 3% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 271. 2x for Hagerty, Inc. — 261. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HGTY: 42. 4% to $14. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR?
In this comparison, HGTY (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NODK, ACGL, PLMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HGTY or NODK or ACGL or PLMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), +321. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +321. 0%, NODK: -13. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HGTY and NODK and ACGL and PLMR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock; NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.