Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
Real Estate - Development
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Residential | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $3.79B | $3.86B | $3.50B | $1.25B | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.51B | $662M | $110M | $212M | $301M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $122M | $48M | $41M | $21M | $117M |
| Gross Margin | 11.1% | 20.2% | 40.4% | 63.6% | 98.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 17.5% | -1.1% | 28.3% | 56.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 99.9x | 16.3x | 20.2x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $5.11B | $2.28B | $514M | $943M | $1.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.47B | $48M | $427M | $128M | $12M |
HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Howard Hughes Holdi… (HHH) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
| Five Point Holdings… (FPH) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| Alexander's, Inc. (ALX) | 100 | 94.0 | -6.0% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HHH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 191.8% 10Y total return vs ALX's 7.4%
FPH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (16.3x vs 21.8x)
ALX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.35, yield 7.4%, current ratio 8.33x
- 7.4% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +23.2% vs IRT's -11.9%
FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 1.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 74.2%, current ratio 0.30x
- 9.7% FFO/revenue growth vs FPH's -53.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% FFO/revenue growth vs FPH's -53.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 21.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs IRT's 7.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs HHH's 0.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.4% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.2% vs IRT's -11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs IRT's 0.8%, ROIC 4.5% vs 1.6% |
HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
FPH leads 1 • ALX leads 1 • HHH leads 0 • IRT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HHH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 13.7x FPH's $110M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRT's 7.3%. On growth, HHH holds the edge at +18.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $662M | $110M | $212M | $301M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $443M | $365M | $2M | $97M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $122M | $48M | $41M | $21M | $117M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $453M | $139M | $4M | $65M | $188M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +20.2% | +40.4% | +63.6% | +98.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +17.5% | -1.1% | +28.3% | +56.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +7.3% | +37.0% | +9.7% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +21.1% | +3.5% | +30.5% | +62.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.4% | +2.5% | +3.2% | -2.7% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -101.4% | -118.8% | -62.1% | +7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, FPH trades at a 85% valuation discount to IRT's 68.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IRT's 16.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALX's 20.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $3.9B | $3.5B | $1.2B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.4B | $6.1B | $3.6B | $2.1B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.25x | 68.21x | 10.19x | 44.39x | 23.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.20x | 99.88x | 16.30x | 20.21x | 21.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 118.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.02x | 16.71x | — | 20.57x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.57x | 5.87x | 31.79x | 5.85x | 9.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.07x | 0.31x | 11.49x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.59x | 26.33x | 33.30x | 16.98x | 14.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALX delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $1 for IRT. FPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALX's 8.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs ALX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +1.3% | +1.8% | +17.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.3% | +2.2% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +1.6% | -0.2% | +5.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +2.4% | -0.2% | +5.5% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.64x | 0.22x | 8.64x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $2.2B | $88M | $815M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $48M | $427M | $128M | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $2.3B | $514M | $943M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.93x | 1.73x | — | 1.55x | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALX five years ago would be worth $12,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,353 for HHH. Over the past 12 months, ALX leads with a +23.2% total return vs IRT's -11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FPH at 27.3% vs HHH's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.4% | -6.0% | -10.1% | +13.6% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.5% | -11.9% | -10.3% | +23.2% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.3% | +7.4% | +106.3% | +69.5% | +14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.5% | +17.8% | -34.6% | +21.5% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.8% | +191.8% | -67.5% | +7.4% | +99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | +2.4% | +27.3% | +19.2% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALX and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HHH's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs HHH's 69.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.48x | 0.87x | 0.35x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.07 | $19.61 | $6.64 | $260.84 | $28.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.01 | $14.60 | $4.72 | $201.28 | $22.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.7% | +83.5% | +73.6% | +93.6% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 62.4 | 47.1 | 60.1 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 498K | 2.2M | 188K | 54K | 658K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALX and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HHH as "Buy", IRT as "Buy", FPH as "Hold", ALX as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 37.8% upside for HHH (target: $88) vs -48.8% for ALX (target: $125). For income investors, ALX offers the higher dividend yield at 7.37% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.50 | $20.08 | — | $125.00 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 27 | 5 | 2 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.0% | — | +7.4% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | — | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.66 | — | $18.00 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FPH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HHH vs IRT vs FPH vs ALX vs FCPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 8% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT?
On trailing P/E, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 68. 2x. On forward P/E, Five Point Holdings, LLC is actually cheaper at 16. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT?
Over the past 5 years, Alexander's, Inc.
(ALX) delivered a total return of +21. 5%, compared to -36. 5% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRT returned +191. 8% versus FPH's -67. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. 's 0. 99β — meaning HHH is approximately 595% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 9% for Alexander's, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -53. 8% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Independence Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 41. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Five Point Holdings, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, FPH leads at 37. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT?
Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the more profitable company, earning 64.
5% net margin versus 8. 4% for Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 64. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCPT leads at 55. 7% versus -6. 7% for FPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) trades at 16.
3x forward P/E versus 99. 9x for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — 83. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HHH: 37. 8% to $87. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT?
In this comparison, ALX (7.
4% yield), FCPT (5. 5% yield), IRT (4. 0% yield) pay a dividend. HHH, FPH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HHH or IRT or FPH or ALX or FCPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, HHH: -32. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HHH and IRT and FPH and ALX and FCPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HHH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FPH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. IRT, ALX, FCPT pay a dividend while HHH, FPH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.