Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Internet Content & Information | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $2.26B | $2.64B | $14.65B | $4.41B | $9.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $5M | $3.69B | $2.18B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $35M | $-189M | $456M | $150M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | -256.2% | 68.8% | 35.2% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -15.4% | 17.7% | 12.6% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.4x | — | 20.0x | 21.8x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.60B | $15M | $1.39B | $280M | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $165M | $45M | $253M | $100M | $366M |
HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 145.1 | +45.1% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 112.9 | +12.9% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 147.4 | +47.4% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +66.8% vs TRMB's -6.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRMB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 12.4% margin vs NN's -41.4%
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -15.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- PEG 2.50 vs TRMB's 8.15
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs FELE's 231.4%
- Beta 0.56 vs HI's 1.92, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs NN's -41.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs HI's 1.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FELE's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.8% vs TRMB's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs NN's -73.1% |
HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMB leads in 1 of 6 categories
HI leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • NN leads 1 • GTLS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 932.4x NN's $5M. TRMB is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, TRMB holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $5M | $3.7B | $2.2B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $286M | -$62M | $785M | $322M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $35M | -$189M | $456M | $150M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | -$51M | $253M | $169M | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | -2.6% | +68.8% | +35.2% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -15.4% | +17.7% | +12.6% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -41.4% | +12.4% | +6.9% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -11.2% | +6.9% | +7.8% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.2% | -50.5% | +11.8% | +9.9% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.1% | -85.2% | +55.6% | +13.4% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.8x trailing earnings, FELE trades at a 95% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FELE offers better value at 3.53x vs TRMB's 14.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.6B | $14.7B | $4.4B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $2.6B | $15.8B | $4.6B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.43x | -13.74x | 35.34x | 30.75x | 628.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.41x | — | 20.01x | 21.77x | 16.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 14.39x | 3.53x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.54x | — | 20.05x | 13.82x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 577.54x | 4.08x | 2.07x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | — | 2.54x | 3.41x | 2.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 126.31x | — | 110.00x | 22.81x | 48.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HI's 1.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HI scores 6/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | — | +8.0% | +11.4% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -73.1% | +5.0% | +7.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | — | +6.8% | +14.7% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | -36.6% | +7.8% | +18.1% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.12x | — | 0.24x | 0.21x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | -$30M | $1.1B | $181M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $165M | $45M | $253M | $100M | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $15M | $1.4B | $280M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | -5.64x | 12.26x | 24.75x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NN five years ago would be worth $19,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,797 for TRMB. Over the past 12 months, HI leads with a +66.8% total return vs TRMB's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 109.2% vs HI's -9.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +20.3% | -21.0% | +3.6% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.8% | +41.4% | -6.7% | +17.7% | +37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.5% | +816.0% | +30.1% | +10.0% | +62.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +96.1% | -22.0% | +20.3% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.5% | +100.1% | +166.8% | +231.4% | +772.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.8% | +109.2% | +9.2% | +3.2% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HI and GTLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HI's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HI currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs TRMB's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 1.33x | 1.46x | 0.92x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.07 | $24.19 | $87.50 | $111.53 | $208.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.46 | $10.84 | $61.63 | $83.42 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +80.7% | +70.7% | +89.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 55.2 | 36.8 | 54.8 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.2M | 1.7M | 281K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HI and FELE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HI as "Buy", NN as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", FELE as "Hold", GTLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for TRMB (target: $95) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, HI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $26.33 | $95.00 | $100.00 | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 3 | 28 | 11 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | — | +1.1% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | 32 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | — | — | $1.11 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.9% | +3.8% | 0.0% |
TRMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HI vs NN vs TRMB vs FELE vs GTLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) offers the better valuation at 30. 8x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS?
On trailing P/E, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the cheapest at 30. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Hillenbrand, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. wins at 2. 50x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, NextNav Inc.
(NN) delivered a total return of +96. 1%, compared to -22. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus HI's +33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Hillenbrand, Inc. 's 1. 92β — meaning HI is approximately 244% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 112% for Hillenbrand, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hillenbrand, Inc. grew EPS 120. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS?
Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMB leads at 16. 9% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 50x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Hillenbrand, Inc. (HI) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 53. 6% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS?
In this comparison, HI (2.
8% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NN, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HI or NN or TRMB or FELE or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, TRMB: +166. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HI and NN and TRMB and FELE and GTLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HI (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and TRMB (Technology) and FELE (Industrials) and GTLS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
HI, FELE pay a dividend while NN, TRMB, GTLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.