REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Office
HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $2.82B | $149.25B | $41.15B | $4.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $820M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $1.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $93M | $1.43B | $260M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 67.4% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.6% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 22.3% |
| Forward P/E | 39.6x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 95.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.64B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $3.68B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $5.03B | $741M | $6M |
HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Cousins Properties … (CUZ) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HIW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.7%, current ratio 42.45x
- Lower P/E (39.6x vs 95.8x)
- 7.7% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.01 vs CUZ's 0.80
CUZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.6x vs 95.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs CUZ's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs CUZ's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs HIW's -5.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs CUZ's -0.1%, ROIC 0.5% vs 2.0% |
HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIW leads in 2 of 6 categories
WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • CUZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HIW and WELL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 14.2x HIW's $820M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CUZ's -0.5%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $820M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $511M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $646M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $93M | $1.4B | $260M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $318M | $2.5B | $1.4B | -$122M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.4% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +57.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.6% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +22.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +21.9% | +22.4% | -12.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.8% | +22.5% | 0.0% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HIW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, HIW trades at a 89% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CUZ's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $149.2B | $41.1B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $8.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.63x | 153.25x | 160.26x | 109.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.58x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 95.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.75x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 12.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.50x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.93x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 32.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-0 for CUZ. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIW's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs CUZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.49x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $5.0B | $741M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.6B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.07x | 0.26x | 1.40x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,995 for HIW. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs HIW's -5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs HIW's 13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.7% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.2% | +42.7% | +33.9% | -0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.3% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.1% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.8% | +223.1% | +65.0% | +25.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUZ's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs HIW's 78.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.76 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $30.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.45 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $21.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.6 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 2.6M | 3.4M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HIW and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIW as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", CUZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.3% upside for CUZ (target: $30) vs 4.9% for VTR (target: $91). For income investors, HIW offers the higher dividend yield at 7.67% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $29.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 34 | 32 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.7% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.96 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HIW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WELL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
HIW vs WELL vs VTR vs CUZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (39. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ?
On trailing P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Highwoods Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -20. 1% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus HIW's -6. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Cousins Properties Incorporated's 0. 80β — meaning CUZ is approximately 8311% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 149% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Cousins Properties Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus 4. 1% for Cousins Properties Incorporated — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIW leads at 26. 0% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIW leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) trades at 39. 6x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 78. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CUZ: 12. 3% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the highest yield at 7. 7%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is HIW or WELL or VTR or CUZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, CUZ: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HIW and WELL and VTR and CUZ?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CUZ is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.