HKD vs NOAH

For growth investors, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is the stronger pick with -21.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -94. 0% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is the cheapest at 2.

2x versus AMTD Digital Inc. at 7. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) delivered a total return of -67.

2%, compared to -89. 6% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOAH returned -41. 8% versus HKD's -89. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

98β versus AMTD Digital Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning HKD is approximately 18% more volatile than NOAH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 162% for AMTD Digital Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is pulling ahead at -21.

1% versus -94. 0% for AMTD Digital Inc. (HKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Noah Holdings Limited grew EPS -53. 5% year-over-year, compared to -91. 2% for AMTD Digital Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AMTD Digital Inc.

(HKD) is the more profitable company, earning 189. 5% net margin versus 18. 3% for Noah Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 189. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HKD leads at 51. 7% versus 24. 4% for NOAH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HKD leads at 78. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, NOAH (97.

4% yield) pays a dividend. HKD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

98), 97. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOAH: -41. 8%, HKD: -89. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (HKD (Technology) and NOAH (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

NOAH pays a dividend while HKD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.