Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HKPD vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
HKPD vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $6.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27K | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 53.9x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $749K | $229M |
HKPD vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Pharma Di… (HKPD) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 72.1 | -27.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HKPD vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HKPD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.66
- Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 1.66, current ratio 2.99x
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 174.3% 10Y total return vs HKPD's -77.0%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs HKPD's 21.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs HKPD's 21.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs HKPD's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.66 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -27.8% vs HIMS's -45.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs HKPD's -0.3%, ROIC 10.7% vs 1.6% |
HKPD vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HKPD vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 115.6x HKPD's $20M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HKPD's -0.1%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.5% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HKPD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HKPD's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 44.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -216.63x | 52.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 53.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.28x | 44.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 2.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 12.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.26x | 93.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-1 for HKPD. HKPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $748,721 | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.35x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $25,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,305 for HKPD. Over the past 12 months, HKPD leads with a -27.8% total return vs HIMS's -45.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 31.4% vs HKPD's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.5% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.8% | -45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +126.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +150.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +174.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | +31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HKPD and HIMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HKPD is the less volatile stock with a 1.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIMS currently trades 38.2% from its 52-week high vs HKPD's 23.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 2.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.76 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.5% | +38.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23K | 35.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% |
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HKPD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HKPD vs HIMS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HKPD or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 21. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 52. 7x trailing P/E (53. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HKPD or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +150. 5%, compared to -77. 0% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +174. 3% versus HKPD's -77. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HKPD or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
66β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 44% more volatile than HKPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — HKPD or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 21. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hims & Hers Health, Inc. grew EPS -3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -101. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — HKPD or HIMS?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -0. 1% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus 0. 7% for HKPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — HKPD or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is HKPD or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HKPD: -77. 0%, HIMS: +174. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between HKPD and HIMS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HKPD (Industrials) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.