Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Medical - Equipment & Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $6.63B | $1.26B | $124M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $2.35B | $2.51B | $109M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27K | $128M | $-171M | $5M |
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 69.7% | 65.6% | 67.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 4.6% | -7.6% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 51.5x | — | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $1.12B | $1.04B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $749K | $229M | $781M | $23M |
HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Pharma Di… (HKPD) | 100 | 32.0 | -68.0% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 68.5 | -31.5% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HKPD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.66
- Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 1.66, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 1.66 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 161.9% 10Y total return vs OPRX's 110.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5%
- 5.5% margin vs TDOC's -6.8%
TDOC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +1.5% vs HIMS's -51.0%
OPRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 51.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs TDOC's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 51.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs TDOC's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.66 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.5% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs TDOC's -5.9%, ROIC 10.7% vs -11.5% |
HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories
HKPD leads 0 • TDOC leads 0 • OPRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 123.8x HKPD's $20M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TDOC's -6.8%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $2.3B | $2.5B | $109M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $164M | $42M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $128M | -$171M | $5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $73M | $251M | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +69.7% | +65.6% | +67.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +4.6% | -7.6% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +5.5% | -6.8% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +3.1% | +10.0% | +10.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +28.4% | -2.5% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.5% | -27.3% | +32.1% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HKPD and TDOC and OPRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.6x trailing earnings, OPRX trades at a 51% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OPRX's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $6.6B | $1.3B | $124M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $7.5B | $1.5B | $105M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -213.33x | 50.32x | -6.11x | 24.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 51.51x | — | 7.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.19x | 42.68x | 15.13x | 6.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 2.82x | 0.50x | 1.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 12.25x | 0.89x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.00x | 89.61x | 4.40x | 6.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TDOC. OPRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 8/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +23.7% | -12.4% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +6.0% | -5.9% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.6% | +10.7% | -11.5% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +10.9% | -10.0% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 2.07x | 0.75x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $892M | $259M | -$19M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $748,721 | $229M | $781M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $1.1B | $1.0B | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.35x | — | -8.76x | 1.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, TDOC leads with a +1.5% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs HKPD's -39.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.7% | -23.2% | -1.3% | -46.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.3% | -51.0% | +1.5% | -30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +116.6% | -73.3% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +137.6% | -95.4% | -87.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +161.9% | -41.1% | +110.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.0% | +29.4% | -35.6% | -23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HKPD and TDOC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HKPD is the less volatile stock with a 1.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDOC currently trades 71.2% from its 52-week high vs HKPD's 23.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.66x | 2.40x | 1.91x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.76 | $70.43 | $9.77 | $22.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $13.74 | $4.40 | $5.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.2% | +36.4% | +71.2% | +29.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 54.5 | 74.1 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 34.9M | 5.5M | 476K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", OPRX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.67 | $7.58 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 42 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
HKPD vs HIMS vs TDOC vs OPRX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX?
On trailing P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the cheapest at 24.
6x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, OptimizeRx Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +161. 9% versus HKPD's -77. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
66β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 44% more volatile than HKPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -1. 5% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -101. 7% for Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -7. 9% for Teladoc Health, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRX leads at 10. 7% versus -10. 4% for TDOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDOC leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 44. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156. 4% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HKPD or HIMS or TDOC or OPRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hong Kong Pharma Digital Technology Holdings Limited (HKPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HKPD: -77. 3%, TDOC: -41. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HKPD and HIMS and TDOC and OPRX?
These companies operate in different sectors (HKPD (Industrials) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare) and OPRX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HKPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.