Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HLIT vs CALX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
HLIT vs CALX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $2.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $143M |
HLIT vs CALX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) | 100 | 227.8 | +127.8% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 308.7 | +208.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLIT vs CALX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (21.8x vs 24.5x)
- 7.8% margin vs CALX's 3.2%
- +38.1% vs CALX's +3.3%
CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Rev growth 20.3%, EPS growth 157.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs HLIT's 269.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.3% revenue growth vs HLIT's 11.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.8x vs 24.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs CALX's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs HLIT's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.1% vs CALX's +3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs CALX's 3.5%, ROIC 9.3% vs 2.1% |
HLIT vs CALX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HLIT vs CALX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HLIT and CALX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 1.7x HLIT's $636M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.8% (HLIT) to 3.2% (CALX). On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $109M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.5% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
HLIT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.2x trailing earnings, HLIT trades at a 78% valuation discount to CALX's 167.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HLIT's 18.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.21x | 167.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.80x | 24.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.93x | 69.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.10x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.13x | 24.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for CALX. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HLIT's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIT scores 7/9 vs CALX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.92x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HLIT and CALX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HLIT five years ago would be worth $16,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,067 for CALX. Over the past 12 months, HLIT leads with a +38.1% total return vs CALX's +3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CALX at 0.7% vs HLIT's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.6% | -18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.1% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.9% | +2.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | -9.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.9% | +513.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.1% | +0.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HLIT and CALX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLIT's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLIT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.38 | $71.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.80 | $40.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.9 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 918K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HLIT as "Hold" and CALX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs 1.8% for HLIT (target: $13).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.50 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +3.3% |
HLIT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
HLIT vs CALX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLIT or CALX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger pick with 20. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 6% for Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) offers the better valuation at 37. 2x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calix, Inc. (CALX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLIT or CALX?
On trailing P/E, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the cheapest at 37. 2x versus Calix, Inc. at 167. 4x. On forward P/E, Harmonic Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLIT or CALX?
Over the past 5 years, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) delivered a total return of +69. 4%, compared to -9. 3% for Calix, Inc. (CALX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +513. 0% versus HLIT's +269. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLIT or CALX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Harmonic Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning HLIT is approximately 51% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 32% for Harmonic Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLIT or CALX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is pulling ahead at 20. 3% versus 11. 6% for Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Harmonic Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HLIT leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLIT or CALX?
Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus 1. 8% for Calix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLIT leads at 9. 3% versus 2. 1% for CALX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLIT or CALX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Calix, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 40. 2% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLIT or CALX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HLIT or CALX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +513. 0% 10Y return). Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +513. 0%, HLIT: +269. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLIT and CALX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HLIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.